OWN capitalists with this one neat trick -- Re: [MINISTRY] capitalism v fascism/ corporatism - what are we (the West) living under?

[Zig the N.g]

It's not Socialism silly, it's -Democratic- Socialism!

  The Bee Explains: Democratic Socialism
  https://babylonbee.com/news/the-bee-explains-democratic-socialism


  Dems: 'Socialism Is The Only Way To End This Nightmare Of Prosperity'
  https://babylonbee.com/news/dems-socialism-is-the-only-way-to-end-this-nightmare-of-prosperity


  Millennial Wishes There Were Some Historical Examples Of Socialism We Could Study To Have Some Idea How It Might Turn Out
  https://babylonbee.com/news/millennial-wishes-there-were-previous-examples-of-socialism-we-could-look-at-to-have-some-idea-how-it-might-turn-out


  Millennial Drops Support For Socialism After Learning How Hard It Is To Get Avocado Toast In Venezuela
  https://babylonbee.com/news/millennial-drops-support-for-socialism-after-learning-how-hard-it-is-to-get-avocado-toast-in-venezuela


  Caravan Of Liberal Americans Makes Way Toward Socialist Paradise Of Venezuela
  https://babylonbee.com/news/caravan-of-liberal-americans-makes-way-toward-socialist-paradise-of-venezuela



On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:30:59AM +0800, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> On 13/02/2018 06:58, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > As Jordan Peterson points out, that "kill everyone in group X" has
> > been tried a few times in the 20th C. - and the leftist Marxists were
> > best at it.
> 
> Kill (or expel, or somehow make sure that everyone from group X is just not
> around any more) is a very common tactic, and one that is with great
> regularity hugely successful.
> 
> It gets massively under reported, because it embarrasses the winners. But if
> you look at demographics and voting patterns, it is obvious that there has
> been a huge amount of it going on, and it works just great for group not-x.
> 
> Forswearing this popular and hugely successful tactic when other groups do not
> forswear it is unilateral disarmament.
> 
> Other groups will not abandon it unless it looks likely to produce blowback on
> them.
> 
> Stuff like whites getting expelled from Detroit, Christians from the middle
> east, etc is not going to stop unless we start doing similar operations on
> blacks and Muslims etc.
> 
> In any situation where it is probable that group x is going to do us, we need
> to do them first.  Then after few massacres and genocides, and possibly
> numerous nuclear explosions, then maybe then we can make a more stable and
> safe arrangement, but we are not going to get a more stable and safe
> arrangement as long as members of group X can get rid of whites, capitalists,
> Christians, etc, and never have any fear that that whites, capitalists,
> Christians, etc, will return the favor.
> 
> No one is motivated to reduce the likelihood of this tactic being used, as
> long as one side gets deemed to be good guys when they use it, and the other
> side bad guys when they resist it.
> 
> Unilaterally forswearing this ever popular and successful tactic does not mean
> that there will be less of it, it means there will be more of it.
> 
> And the most morally defensible application of this ever popular and regularly
> successful approach is to do to commies, what commies always do to kulaks.