[OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Cryptocurrencies: alpha-11 US-Public System released

[other.arkitech]

 [OBORONA-SPAM] ? this should be a false positive
answer inline..

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, February 2, 2020 12:20 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 10:24:33AM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > > > I do share the code with devs for specific patches under NDA.
> > >
> > > NDA? LMAO! Frankly, at this point I should tell you to get lost.
> >
> > said who?
>
> There might be something lost in language barrier - or not, not sure
> here.
>
> There are perhaps not many "hard core floss devs" willing to sign an
> NDA with you.
>
> The question folks will want answered is "why should I sign an NDA,
> just to look at code or to write some modules?"
>
> But again, perhaps we are missing something between the language
> barriers...
>
> Knowing the following getting repetitive, I strongly suggest
> beginning discussions on the real fundamentals - some are simply not
> grasping that your "virtual/ collective/ public ledger taxation"
> model is something we want to get on board with.
>
> It might be - but such a "might be" must live in the minds of those
> you want to convince to join you, see?
>
> Such conversations might best be started with questions.
>
> Here's one such hypothetical beginning:
>
> Do we consider roads to be "public infrastructure"?
>
> In what ways can we pay for roads?
>
> Do we want more roads?
>
> What criteria should we use for deciding amongst the different ways
> to pay for new roads?
>
> Good luck,

Thanks for changing route Zen,
As Punk-Stasi points out the Public System definition is vague at this point. what this USPS proposes is a bottom-up approach to a Public System, starting from the fundamentals.
The proposal is to replace current Governments with a low-cost distributed machine that would collect inputs and produce outputs in infinite loop. A system that would have a real view of the 'common interest' because it would not apply filters in people's input.
The system would be able to let people decide whether if a 'road' is convenient or not, and how to fund it.
Everything is better compared to our current model of participation in the society based on ticking a box every 4 or 5 years.