Foundations for treason against MSM executives ? -- ONE lousy vote, every 4 years! - treason - USA 2020 Elections: Thread

Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net
Sun Dec 13 00:05:05 PST 2020


On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 06:36:44PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:33:27AM +1000, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> > On 2020-12-11 08:28, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > Jim, do you know if treason is defined in the USA constitution?
> > 
> > Section 3 of the constitution:
> > 
> >       Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying
> > War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and
> > Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony
> > of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
> > 
> >       The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of
> > Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or
> > Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
> > 
> > Which presupposes a well defined enemy who is in a state of war with a
> > state of united states.
> > 
> > If the Chinese had a hand in rigging the election, I suppose that would
> > suffice, but it is probably an inside job.
> 
> Indeed, "pay to play" on the scale of empire - China was built up by the West, so that had more shekels in the pay to play game.  "We" created our own nemesis in that sense.
> 
> 
> 
> > On the face of it, disregarding the constitution, abandoning due
> > process, and stuffing ballot boxes does not constitute treason as
> > defined in the constitution.
> 
> So we need sufficient witnesses for criminal, or at least civil, claims.
> 
> 1000 is our starting point (though some may be false fags themselves, spanners in the cogs so to speak).
> 
> Perhaps the smell of money in the form of civil claims will bring out more?
> 
> And the Govt in the form of the treasury/Fed can foot the entire bill: $5,000 to every disenfranchised Republican voter - which of course is every Republican voter :)
> 
> Might also cause a slight increase in future voter turnout :D
> 
> Only via a SCOTUS court order mind you...



As shown with the "smirking" Covington Catholic lad, Nicholas Sandmann, and now potentially the DoD itself, rigorous and persistent civil claims may well be part of the answer to today's zeitgeist:

   Acting Secretary of Defense’s Chief of Staff, Kash Patel, Files a $50M Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN
   https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/acting-secretary-defenses-chief-staff-kash-patel-files-50m-defamation-lawsuit-cnn/

      …claiming the liberal network published false statements and promoted “unfounded left-wing political narratives” by painting Patel as a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist seeking to smear President-elect Joe Biden.

      The complaint filed on Friday in Virginia Circuit Court named CNN reporters Barbara Starr, Zachary Cohen, Ryan Browne, Alex Marquardt and Nicole Gaouette as defendants, in addition to the network itself. It claims CNN “deliberately or recklessly conveyed a false message” to sensationalize the “news” and humiliate Patel.

      ... Kash Patel is infamous for his work in uncovering the Russia collusion hoax and the many lies surrounding the scandal.  Patel worked for Devin Nunes and was instrumental in uncovering the Russiagate scandal – here is Nunes recently discussing Hillary Clinton’s efforts in creating the Russia collusion scandal:
      ...



Bring it ... claim it good ... win it real good  :D



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list