4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after Pfizer Covid-19 jab -- COVID-19 Vaccine Is Safe Because It’s Called a Vaccine - If it says "Vaccination" on the label, inject it immediately - right to choose substances / objects inserted into your body

[Zenaan Harkness]

   4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after taking Pfizer Covid-19
   jab, prompting FDA to recommend ‘surveillance for cases’
   https://www.rt.com/usa/509081-pfizer-vaccine-fda-bells-palsy-covid/

      Four trial participants who received the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine
      experienced facial paralysis, according to the Food and Drug
      Administration. The FDA said the issue should be monitored as the
      jab becomes more widely available.

      …According to the documents, Bell’s palsy, a form of temporary
      facial paralysis, was reported by four participants during phase 3
      trials. The individuals had been administered the jab, and no
      members of the placebo group experienced similar adverse effects.

      …However, the FDA claimed that the frequency of the health issue
      is “consistent with the expected background rate in the general
      population,” and added that there was no clear evidence linking
      the coronavirus vaccine to the unpleasant medical condition.
      Still, the federal regulator recommended “surveillance for cases
      of Bell’s palsy with deployment of the vaccine into larger
      populations.”

      The FDA noted the “numerical imbalance” of Bell’s palsy cases
      among the vaccine and placebo groups, but said there were no other
      “non-serious adverse events” that showed a similar pattern.

      According to the documents, side effects are common but appear to
      be minor. Out of the trial participants, 84 percent experienced
      some kind of reaction. After receiving the jab, 63 percent of
      trial subjects reported fatigue and 55 percent said they suffered
      from headaches. Chills were reported by 32 percent of
      participants, 24 percent complained of joint pain and 14 percent
      developed a fever.

[and DIRECTLY after that list, this nugget:]

      Overall, the jab appears to have received good marks from the FDA.
      In its report, the regulator said that the two-dose vaccine is
      about 50 percent effective even after just the first injection.
      The vaccine is believed to be 95 percent effective after the
      second dose, administered three weeks later. The FDA also found
      that the jab reduced the risk of severe Covid-19 symptoms after
      the first dose.

[except for the Bell's palsy and all those other side effects, and your
 normal immune system being effective for your survival in 99.7% of
 cases.
 And note, from the WHO themselves:
   https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters
   Most people who get COVID-19 have mild or moderate symptoms and can
   recover thanks to supportive care. If you have a cough, fever and
   difficulty breathing seek medical care early - call your health
   facility by telephone first. If you have fever and live in an area
   with malaria or dengue seek medical care immediately.
]



On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:26:25AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>    Professor Sir John Bell, professor of medicine at Oxford University:
>    “These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population.
>    They are very likely to have an effect which works in a %, say 60 or
>    70%.”
>    https://theduran.com/these-vaccines-are-unlikely-to-completely-sterilize-a-population-professor-sir-john-bell-sage/
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     We Know the COVID-19 Vaccine Is Safe Because It’s Called a Vaccine
>       Vaccines are safe. All of them.
>       The Covid Rouge
>       Marko Marjanović
>     https://www.anti-empire.com/we-know-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-safe-because-because-its-called-a-vaccine/
> 
>       Long-term trials are for pussies. And science-deniers.
> 
>       2019: Vaccines are safe because they’re so thoroughly tested for
>             short-term and long-term side effects alike. So if you’re
>             declining an approved and tried-and-true jab you’re just
>             being irrational and superstitious.
> 
>       2020: Here is the first-ever vaccine of its kind (mRNA) that is
>             essentially untested and was rolled out in all of 6 months
>             with no chance to study long-term side effects whatsoever,
>             but it’s safe because it’s called a vaccine and other
>             vaccines that are approved after extensive long-term trials
>             that this vaccine did nor receive are safe.
> 
>       Call me crazy but it would seem the argument changed a little bit
>       here?
> 
>       What if a person wanted to remain a pro-vaxxer of the
>       2019 variety?
> 
>       What if someone took the position of “shoot me up with as many
>       vaccines as possible AFTER they have gone through rigorous and
>       extensive trials including long-term ones and passed them”?
> 
>       That would now be deemed selfish, dangerous, irresponsible,
>       unjustifiable, silly, dumb buffoonish, stupid, and against your
>       health interest.
> 
>       What was an orthodoxy when this year started is now heretical.
> 
>       We’re living in an Orwellian reality where what is almost
>       universally held true one moment, can become a thought-crime of
>       the highest order in the next one.
> 
>       Forget about common sense. Forget about being allowed to keep an
>       awareness of proportion, context, and second-order consequences.
>       We are not even allowed to keep to the orthodoxies of 2019.
> 
>       Everything must fall to the Covid Rouge and its Year Zero reset.
> 
>       So remember citizen. The Covid-19 vaccine is safe because it’s
>       called a vaccine and other vaccines that are approved after the
>       kind of trials this vaccine did not receive are safe. Very simple
>       to understand.
> 
>       Besides, it’s a vaccine for an extremely deadly plague with a
>       99.98% survival rate for the under 60 that you definitely don’t
>       want to take your chances with.
> 
>       Much better to bet on the extremely low likelihood of human folly,
>       and place yourself in the tender care of fanatics. That has a much
>       better track record.
>       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward
> 
>       After all, humans unintentionally sacrificing other humans to
>       their fanaticism, ideology, messianic complexes, panic, cowardice,
>       and pride — that almost never happens.
>       https://www.anti-empire.com/2020-the-year-governments-killed-hundreds-of-thousands-of-their-own-people/
> 
>       Well, maybe it could happen. But surely the chance is much smaller
>       than 0.02%. Surely. Because if the chance that the money-hungry
>       Big Pharma, clueless politicians, and the Messianic COVID Rouge
>       overlooked something is much greater than 0.02% then it would make
>       sense for the majority to take their chances with nature’s
>       coronavirus instead. But that’s not the case, surely. If the likes
>       of Boris Johnson say it’s safe that’s good enough for me. I don’t
>       even need a long-term trial. And it seems neither do they.
> 
>       Funny how that works though. Up until now you were supposed to —
>       if at all possible — not even leave your room. Risk aversion was
>       everything. Is the world going to hell in a handbasket? Yes, but
>       that’s the price we’re willing to pay in order to spare you from
>       having to take an unknown risk. In fact, we believe so strongly in
>       you not taking a risk that we’re willing to strip you of rights to
>       prevent you from being able to do it yourself.
> 
>       But now that there’s an experimental vaccine based on completely
>       novel technology? Well now go right ahead and inject yourself with
>       that! Take a ride on the wild side! To do less would be to deny
>       science. And in fact, we may take away your rights if you don’t.
> 
>       Sometimes we keep you from risk, sometimes we push you into risk.
>       But what is a constant is that your rights are always the
>       collateral damage. You know. By accident. Because we know what’s
>       best for you, for us.
> 
>       And what’s best for you for us, is that your rights be held by us
>       in escrow. Really in the long view, you will come to see this
>       whole Covid business as a blessing as it will have more firmly
>       placed you in the hands of your betters. Things will be so much
>       better from now on. Particularly for us. And for you. Once you
>       develop a taste for weather-sustainable cockroach milk.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:54:26PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > If it says "Vaccination" on the label, inject it immediately:
> > 
> >    MSM 2018: Swine-Flu Vaccine Side-Effects So Bad ‘That Children Were Like Schizophrenics’
> >    https://www.anti-empire.com/msm-2018-swine-flu-vaccine-side-effects-so-bad-that-children-were-like-schizophrenics/
> > 
> >       And here we were thinking if it says 'vaccine' on the label you should inject it
> >       Ralph Riegel  2 Jun 20
> > 
> >       Children who developed narcolepsy after being given the swine flu vaccine were affected by such serious sleep-disorder related conditions that some were initially thought to be suffering from schizophrenia.
> > 
> >       The revelation came as the solicitors acting for two-thirds of those now suing the State over having received the controversial vaccine Pandemrix warned that a redress scheme was simply not enough and that full accountability was required for what happened.
> > 
> >       In severe cases, sufferers can fall asleep at any time – when they are eating, sitting watching TV or even while working in a school classroom.
> > 
> >       Many suffer from cataplexy – loss of muscle tone – causing them to collapse like a puppet when experiencing extreme emotions. They also suffer from sleep paralysis, rendering them unable to move while they experience hallucinations.
> > 
> >       In many cases, the severity of these dreams and nightmares, and their understandable consequences for young people, led doctors to suspect a form of schizophrenia before narcolepsy was finally diagnosed.
> > 
> >       Solicitors Michael Boylan and Gillian O’Connor warned that those patients who developed narcolepsy from Pandemrix now suffered from a life-long condition.
> > 
> >       Mr Boylan said what sufferers had endured was simply beyond belief.
> > 
> >       “There is no cure. This is something that these people, many of whom are children, are going to have to live with and cope with for the rest of their lives,” he said.
> > 
> >       “While redress is very important in terms of supporting them as they live their lives, one size does not fit all.
> > 
> >       “Redress will not deliver or answer the fundamental issue of how this happened and what accountability there will be.
> > 
> >       “This is not Ireland in the 1950s or 1960s. This only happened nine years ago, and people are entitled to answers about what happened.”
> > 
> >       Ms O’Connor said that a key element was why families were informed a vaccine was perfectly safe for use when health chiefs knew that it had not been fully tested.
> > 
> >       She queried why healthcare workers administering the vaccine were advised that it was untested, but the public was told it was safe.
> > 
> >       She added that it was further inferred that Pandemrix was as a safe as the ordinary flu vaccine, which had been on the market for 60 years.
> > 
> >       Around 100 people are now suing the State over the provision of the Pandemrix vaccine in 2009 and 2010.
> > 
> >       A test case is already before the High Court and the Health Minister. The HSE and vaccine makers GlaxoSmithKline have already spent millions of euro in defending it.
> > 
> >       Sufferers of Unique Narcolepsy Disorder (Sound), a group which represents those affected by the vaccine, stressed that they accept the State acted with the best intentions in 2009 when the World Health Organisation (WHO) warned of an imminent swine flu pandemic.
> > 
> >       “We are not anti-vaccine, and it is very important to stress that,” co-founder Tom Matthews said.
> > 
> >       Source: Independent.ie
> >       https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/health/swine-flu-vaccine-side-effects-so-bad-that-children-were-like-schizophrenics-37275895.html
> >