Obama fesses up to reason for drone-bombing M.E. weddings -- Former US intel analyst arrested for leaking DroneWar dox

[Zenaan Harkness]

The Nobel Peace Prize takes a standing ovation for poignant winners as Barack Obama demonstrates disappointment in drone strikes since the problem with them is that they "probably had less collateral damage" than the alternatives, even though those drone strikes "caused an inordinate amount of civilian casualties".

Such an upstanding sociopath really demonstrates the force of the Nobel Peace Prize program better than any other winner before Obama.

Bravo, ex-president "Drone-Bama" Obama - you are owning being a sociopath like an alpha - BRAVO.

   Watch: Obama Casually Admits His Drone Strikes Killed "Inordinate Amount" Of Innocent Civilians
   https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-obama-still-defends-drone-strikes-after-admitting-inordinate-amount-civilians
   Tue, 12/01/2020 - 21:05




On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:28:19PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> A little quote of honesty from Barack Husein "Drone-bama" Obama, all but hidden inside 700 pages of crap:
> 
>    ‘Killing for optics’? Obama claims he ‘took no joy’ in drone strikes, but ordered them to avoid looking ‘soft on terrorism’
>    https://www.rt.com/usa/507180-obama-drone-strikes-book-emanuel/
> 
>        Former US President Barack Obama has sparked an anti-war backlash
>        after saying in his new memoir he “took no joy” in ordering
>        deadly drone strikes, reasoning that his administration “couldn't
>        afford to look soft on terrorism.”
> 
>          … This didn’t age well.Obama and Biden promised to end the US
>          wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.Instead, they expanded Bush’s wars
>          from 2 to 7, and increased drone strikes ten fold.
>          https://t.co/84zLcbApBD
>              — Sarah Abdallah (@sahouraxo) November 18, 2020
> 
> 
>       … The ‘Drone Papers’ leak in 2015 revealed that, at least during
>       one period, 90 percent of US drone strike victims were“not the
>       intended targets.”
> 
>       …
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 11:57:20PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote:
> > 
> > On 5/11/19 12:16 AM, Razer wrote:
> > > A former US intel analyst was arrested Thursday under the Espionage Act.
> > > He allegedly leaked dox about the US Drone War program. Daniel Hale
> > > faces up to 50 yrs in prison, accused of disclosing 11 top secret/secret
> > > documents to a reporter.
> > 
> > If this took place before The Intercept burned Reality Winner, shame on
> > The Intercept.  If it took place after, shame on the leaker.
> > 
> > I saw a story indicating that prior to publishing the material submitted
> > by Ms. Winner, The Intercept called the Feds to verify that the zip code
> > on the package matched the facility their source told them it came from.
> >  Not certain this actually happened - but given what came next I do not
> > doubt it.
> > 
> > The Intercept published at least one high quality scan of a document
> > sent by Ms. Winner, with the printer's watermarks intact:  This told
> > world + Feds the printer's serial number, and time the document was
> > printed.  When I read about that, I went to The Intercp's site and
> > downloaded the image in question.  I bumped up the contrast and tweaked
> > its colors a bit:  Viola, the repeating watermark pattern jumped right out.
> > 
> > Starting on the date The Intecept openly and publicly burned Ms. Winner
> > - whether through shocking ignorance and negligence, or by design -
> > anyone who sends them 'dangerous documents' has no one to blame but
> > themselves the first morning they wake up in a Federal prison.
> > 
> > :o/