Cryptocurrency: The Breaking Point and Death of Keynes

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:42:33PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:26:39 +1000
> Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
> 
> > Unpacking modern Marxism,
> 	
> 	Oh, I see that you ignored my comments on all your jew-kristian fascist garbage and started to hysterically whine about 'marxism' yet again...just to divert attention from your jew-kristian fascist garbage, go figure. Hey, you're a 'modern' 'marxist'. 


You can't debate the principles of faith with logic - well of course you can, but after a very short while it becomes utterly pointless - I'm sure you don't want to waste your time on a pointless debate?  And in any case I don't want to waste our time on a pointless debate...

To remove any doubt here, your "existential"/ logical positions which you take in relation to "all things faith related", is always going to be the "winning" position.

And further, when you receive "no response" to a position, it is normally assumed that you "won" that particular point or that part of the argument.

I assume this, and those who don't think, tend to subconsciously make the same assumption.


Regarding acknowledgements, on most logical/ fact based positions you take, when you lay down a winning point, it is nice to get an acknowledgement from your "opponent".

But when a faith position is taken, the acknowledgement can only really be "this is oil and water, or incompatible debating positions" - such incompatible positions are at a stalemate.



> 	"Marxist framework presupposes a relationship of oppressor and oppressed " 
> 
> 	that's not marxism, that's reality. 


Yes and no, and that simplistic position is the root cause of a lotta problems today.

The point is, that if that's the _only_ view of reality that you "permit" in your "debate", then you can be rightly classified as a "Marxist loonatic" or "Marxist despot".

It would be stupid to deny that there are those who are oppressed and oppressors, and that's not being attempted here.

The "BUT" is this: a hierarchy of humans does not always/ have to mean "someone's getting oppressed" (which is the sole position modern Marxists take, and which they use to oppress all alternative positions).