*SPAM* Cryptocurrency: Rise and Fall of Bitcoin (2011 Throwback Docu)

[Se7en]

On 20-08-14 05:34:35, grarpamp wrote:
> > I believe the reason this is considered spam is because
> 
> ...antispam.
> 
> No, the actual reasons were detailed in the score block.

I know.

> Humorous such a system claiming to "protect" users
> from "spam" to be modifying the subject, adding blocks
> of data *spam* to it, and then itself be *spamming* the
> subscribers with the result.

As I said, I believe you confused the system.

> [Snip]
>
> > you copied rendered HTML elements
> 
> Nope.
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I said /rendered/ HTML elements. Look at your own damn email

> > email is incredibly large paragraphs
> 
> Nmp.

You should consider who is going to read your emails if all you're
doing is copy/pasting entire articles unabridged. 


-- 
|-----/                   | Se7en
     /  The One and Only! | se7en at cock.email
    /                     | 0x0F83F93882CF6116
   /                      | https://se7en-site.neocities.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20200814/d97565cb/attachment.sig>