NYTimes snitches Ukraine phone call whistleblower, tries to rationalize it under false pretenses

[John Young]

Identity of the CIA Whistleblower

Already the whistleblower is under attack and 
threated with retribution, unlikely to be 
defended by any of the parties involved despite 
protection regulations. Only the public can 
protect the party against closed government ranks 
and official secrecy practices.

Dominant issue now is, are, the whistleblower 
complaint cover-up(s): why CIA counsel reported 
the complaint to White House beyond required 
simple notification, records of the extended 
discussions among CIA, White House, DoJ and ODNI, 
why the White House hid the allegedly 
unclassified materal in a highly classified 
server, who was involved in stalling and hiding, 
was the hidden material modified, were copies 
and/or back-ups made to assure accuracy, who had 
access to the hidden material, when will it be 
made public in full withut redactions of any 
material and any related substantiation.

Then, what other material was handled in this 
manner, and same disclosures about that material.





At 12:28 AM 9/27/2019, you wrote:
> >> Recognizing that outing the whistleblower 
> may not be viewed as an appropriate decision, 
> the report included a quote from Dean Baquet, 
> the executive editor of the Times, where he 
> stated, “The role of the whistleblower, 
> including his credibility and his place in the 
> government, is essential to understanding one 
> of the most important issues facing the 
> country—whether the president of the United 
> States abused power and whetheer the White House covered it up.”
>
> > It actually is not. The contents of the 
> disclosure are all the public needs to 
> determine whether the president committed an 
> abuse of power, covered up an abuse of power, 
> and engaged in conduct that rises to the level of impeachment.
>
> > The inspector general’s office for the 
> “intelligence community” already 
> determined—within the Intelligence Commuunity 
> Whistleblower Protection Act—that the 
> allegations rose to the level of a matter of 
> “urgent concern.” That gave the 
> whistleblower credibility, regardless of what 
> any politician in Congress or staff member in the White House may say."
>
><https://shadowproof.com/2019/09/26/new-york-times-outs-individual-behind-ukraine-call-whistleblower-complaint-sparks-outrage/>https://shadowproof.com/2019/09/26/new-york-times-outs-individual-behind-ukraine-call-whistleblower-complaint-sparks-outrage/
>Rr
>Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail