I'm trying to understand site https://mailing-list-archive.cryptoanarchy.wiki/
Punk - Stasi 2.0
punks at tfwno.gf
Thu Oct 31 12:33:39 PDT 2019
-----------------
From: jim bell <jimbell at pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:39:54 +0800
Subject: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong?
>>1. Governments will no longer be "necessary," if they ever were.
>>2. Protection will no longer depend on having a "government."
>>3. Anonymous networking technology will protect our rights, to the extent
>>they can be protected.
>>4. Your statement, "...anarchy is a massive step backward..." is absolutely
>>incorrect.
>That's fine that you believe the things, but for acceptance by others you
>will have to provide support for your position. I, personally, would like
>to see your premises so that I may evualuate your claims. You may indeed
>be correct in your assessment.
Well, here's my "Assassination Politics" essay.
[Part 1]
I've been following the concepts of digital cash and encryption, since
I read the article in the August 1992 issue of Scientific American on
"encrypted signatures." While I've only followed the Digitaliberty area
for a few weeks, I can already see a number of points that do (and
(rest of essay clipped)
---------------------------
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list