Low speed, p2p, wireless as a secure alternative to SMS and Signal-like services.

[Steven Schear]

Unless a Snowden-like WB comes forward its quite unlikely to have internal
documents admitting their limits. However, there are a number of relatively
recent academic papers that look at this battle of limits from a jamming
and other perspectives. They mostly indicate that with the proper covert
tech and channel conditions its practical to avoid detection LPI and
intercept LPI.

I'll try to illuminate some of this and other issues (e.g., key exchange)
in later posts.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019, 9:17 PM Punk - Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:33:28 +0000
> Steven Schear <schear.steve at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Despite massive SIGINT investments she is at disadvantage but the
> > intel agency narratives would have others believe they are all-seeing
> > all-knowing.
>
>         the same 'intelligence' agency, aka the americunt govcorp, will
> have you believe that their honeypots like the tor network are 'safe' and
> 'protect the human rights of 'journalists''
>
>         so what's needed here is actual knowdlegde of their 'capabilities.
> Your assumption that they are just bragging is complete bullshit.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1611 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20191028/da6a6da1/attachment.txt>