Tulsi Gabbard: the US has sponsored Al Qaeda terrorists for its objective of overthrowing the government in Damascus - [PEACE]

[Zenaan Harkness]

Tulsi Gabbard, a Hindu woman from Hawaii (minority alert), USA army
Major (MIC alert), Democratic presidential candidate ("democracy"
alert), is once again storming the DNC's public debates, calmly
levelling with the American people and the world about at least some
of the evils of the North American empire.



  Tulsi Gabbard Needs To Be Stopped... She's Telling People The Truth
  About US Wars
  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tulsi-gabbard-needs-be-stopped-shes-telling-people-truth-about-us-wars
  https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/10/18/tulsi-nails-national-tv-us-regime-change-wars/

    ... “Donald Trump has blood of the Kurds on his hands, but so do
    many of the politicians in our country from both parties who have
    supported this ongoing regime-change war in Syria that started in
    2011… along with many in the mainstream media who have been
    championing and cheer-leading this regime-change war.”

  ... The other 11 Democratic candidates on the stage during the TV
  debate looked agog after Gabbard’s devastating and calmly delivered
  statement. All the others have proffered the false narrative that
  US forces are in Syria to “fight terrorism”. They deplore Trump’s
  announcement last week to pull back US troops from northeast Syria
  because, they say, it will undermine the fight against Islamic
  State (IS or ISIS) and other Al Qaeda affiliates. They also condemn
  Trump for “betraying Kurdish allies” by his partial troop
  withdrawal.

  President Donald Trump talks about “ending endless wars” and
  “bringing our troops home”. But he still premises his views on a
  credulous belief that the US under his watch “defeated ISIS 100 per
  cent”. In that way, he essentially shares the same corny view as
  the Democrats and media that America is a force for good, that it
  is the “good guys wearing white hats riding into the sunset”.

  On the other hand, Gabbard stands alone in telling the American
  people the plain and awful truth. US policy is the fundamental
  problem. Ending its regime-change war in Syria and elsewhere and
  ending its diabolical collusion with terror groups is the way to
  bring peace to the Middle East and to spare ordinary Americans from
  the economic disaster of spiraling war debts. American citizens
  need to know the truth about the horror their government, military,
  media and politicians have inflicted not just on countries in the
  Middle East, but also from the horrendous boomerang consequences of
  this criminal policy on the lives and livelihoods of ordinary
  Americans, including millions of veterans destroyed by injuries,
  trauma, suicide, and drug abuse.

  ... A major online poll by the Drudge Report found that she stole a
  march on all the other candidates, winning approval from nearly 40
  per cent of voters. Top ticket candidates Elizabeth Warren, Bernie
  Sanders and Joe Biden were trailing behind with 7 per cent or less.

  Gabbard has clearly struck a deep chord with the US public in her
  honest depiction of American wars.

  Despite her shattering exposé and seeming appreciation by the
  public, most mainstream media tried to bury her after the TV
  debate. Outlets like Vox and CNN declared that Warren was the
  winner of the debate, whose talking points were mainly about
  domestic policy issues. Like the other candidates, Warren plies the
  propaganda narrative of US forces “fighting terrorism”. Vox even
  slated Gabbard as “a loser” in the debate and claimed she had made
  “blatantly false” statements about the US’ role in Syria.

  Other mainstream news outlets chose to ignore reporting on
  Gabbard’s demolishing of the official propaganda about American
  wars. Earlier this week, CNN and the New York Times smeared her as
  a “Russian asset” and an “apologist for Assad”, referencing a visit
  she made to Syria in 2017 when she held talks with President Assad.

  The Democratic National Committee is claiming that Gabbard does not
  have sufficient support in polls it deems worthy for her to qualify
  for appearing in the next TV debate in November.

...