Facialized: Masks and Facepaint are now Felonies in HongKong, Except for Police

[Razer]

Yeah? So? France set the precedent for this. No chadors. Headscarve. Burkinis. etc.

Ps. According to Pepe Escobar and everyone who notes the brit colonial flags, US flags, and pepe the pukefrog posters, this is a US backed destabilization operation. Joshua Wong, the ostensible protest 'spark plug' has long deep connections to US NGOs and regime-change academia.

Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail



On October 5, 2019 8:12:02 PM PDT, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:
>https://gizmodo.com/hong-kong-announces-ban-on-masks-and-face-paint-that-he-1838765030
>https://twitter.com/austinramzy/status/1180024240034086912
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKaboI74CQM
>
>The Hong Kong government is banning masks and face paint in an attempt
>to stop the pro-democracy protests that have been raging since June.
>"The new 'emergency' order was announced by Hong Kong leader Carrie
>Lam at a press conference today and will go into effect at midnight
>local time, 12:00 pm ET," reports Gizmodo. From the report: The new
>law bans "any facial covering that is likely to prevent
>identification," during public demonstrations. Anyone arrested under
>the new rule will face up to a year in prison and a fine of roughly
>$3,200 U.S. "We believe that the new law will create a new deterrence
>effect against masked violent protesters and rioters," Lam said at a
>press conference that was carried live online. "Hong Kong is not in a
>state of emergency," Lam assured citizens. "But we are indeed in a
>location of serious danger."
>
>Hong Kong protesters, upset about Beijing's political incursion into
>the region, wear masks primarily for three reasons. First, protesters
>want to keep from being identified by cameras around the city that use
>facial recognition software. Second, the protesters don't want to be
>identified by police forces on the ground, allowing authorities to
>target them later when they arrive home. And third, the masks can
>shield protesters from teargas, which has become a common weapon
>deployed by police. Lam said at today's press conference that bans on
>face coverings were "something which has already been introduced in a
>number of jurisdictions around the world" and defended the move as
>something that could help to restore peace and order in the region.
>Lam notes that the new law is exempt for people who need to cover
>their faces for their jobs. What this means is that police will likely
>be allowed to wear masks, while the average civilian will not.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3075 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20191005/71244631/attachment.txt>