Assassination Politics AP

[grarpamp]

> How in the holy Universe would one ever distinguish that this "system" over time was working anymore than random chance?

The system itself must be publicly accessible
so that anons can fund different corrective,
rehabilitative, warning and a variety of other
goals and levels as needed. Predictors come
from all walks and must be able to see the
board to select their jobs. The predictions
must also be public in order for the awarders
to hand out to matching predictors. Funders need
to see correct awards to trust putting their funds
into new objectives. And any derivatives layer would
also need everything public. Predictions could be private
if an AI factbot is awarding to the correct predictor.
And news media would cover changes of heart in
high profile figures anyways.
Initially, until a new far lower equilibrium count
is reached, politicians and evil corp types
will be resigning in large numbers.
Given effectively zero of them resign
in history, that will be more than random.
Other than identities, locations, fintech,
the system is open.

> Also, what is the difference between your system that Assassinates Politicians and a duplicate system in which one donates small amounts of cash to sway peoples opinions away from said politicians views, call it Political(instead of Character) Assassination.

The former solves the problem at the source by
modifying the selected person etc, the latter tries to
route around them which may have limited success.

> death?

Anyone who understands how AP works will know
that even the most stubborn target will stand down
well before then. You should make some budget
estimates on how much it might take for various
type of people in various roles to wise up and correct
their ways before then.

> encryption breaks and your "anonymity" just went out the window.

Security is rarely a function on a single variable S(x).
And most breaks are not in the cryptography itself.