Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower

[Razer]

On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already
>been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could
>constitute "interfering with a criminal investigation".  But your
>imagination may differ.
>             Jim Bell


DUDE! We're talking about a federally taxed and regulated (FCC FTC et al) CORPORATION, NOT an individual! If they get a GAG ORDER or whatever it might be called legally, they WILL EXECUTE IT, including any searches and destroys they're capable of if demanded.

There was also a bunch of idiots who thought that online proxy service that acted on a court order a few years ago should have 'done a riseup' and taken a fireaxe to their server, but as I said at the top, they're a bunch of idiots.

Also note that someday soon the espionage act will be modded to make it a crime to pass on information that you weren't even aware was classified, which is EXACTLY the reason why Julian Asssange claims to have had the inspiration for Wikileaks.

Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail


Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1257 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20191110/f6bd192f/attachment.txt>