Could somebody list names/emails of 1996 people?

[John Young]

For many years a "cypherpunks-who" request to the server would 
deliver a list of subscribers (not the list of posters). Many 
subscribers did not post. Others used psuedos, changed nyms, subbed 
under different addresses and affiliations. Some copied and used 
other subscribers' nyms to post, ridicule, attack, stir up trouble. 
The list changed hosts. There were several branches off the original 
trunk And much more mayhem. Cpunks was and is supposed to work that 
way, its not meant to be a reliable forum (as some branches aspired to be).

Not surprising that there are gaps, accidental, on purpose, through 
negligence, machinic errors, malice, ideological differences, 
forgeries, thefts.

May be a pipe dream to gather everything, stuff has gone missing from 
the internet since its beginning and not likely to ever stop. Spam 
and hucksterism are eternal

Its a fools gold fantasy to think stuff endures somewhere. None of 
the major archives are complete and are riddled with errors and 
misinformation. And its getting worse through every increasing volume 
of puke and planting of huge amount of commercial junk.

Promoters of aggregating and conserving the data tsunami are full of 
shit. Mostly they peddle fear and salvation.

BTW, Jim, AP could get a boost by claiming it could exterminate child 
sex predators.



At 01:31 PM 11/10/2019, jim bell wrote:
>I want to do an email alerting 1995/96 users of the Cypherpunks list 
>to the forgery of the 1995 docket.  Could somebody make a list of 
>the email addresses of people sending/receiving emails in 
>1996?   Just a list of unique emails addresses, of course.  Then, 
>could somebody check those names and email addresses against the 
>early 2000's Cypherpunks archives, perhaps to catch email changes?
>
>This is important.  Thank you.
>
>              Jim Bell