Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower

jim bell jdb10987 at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 9 12:53:03 PST 2019


 I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could constitute "interfering with a criminal investigation".  But your imagination may differ.
             Jim Bell

    On Saturday, November 9, 2019, 12:47:26 PM PST, Razer <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:  
 
 This is your answer and China will stomp you if you INTERFERE WITH A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION too. So will any court system on earth. 

Get psychiatric help.

"Facebook says it is removing mentions of the alleged whistleblower’s name and will revisit this decision if the name is widely published in the media or used by public figures in debate."

On November 9, 2019 10:44:33 AM PST, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
https://apnews.com/ad8f2a9b6e424138afcc97fcf2eb29bf

I wonder what they mean by "deleting the name"?  Do they mean deleting any posting or comment containing the name 'Eric Ciaramella'?  Or just that name?  Or any posting that says that "Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower"?
This sure sounds like Facebook is adopting the policies of Red China, "The Great Firewall of China".
I've got a solution to that problem:  The people who work for Facebook are identifiable, and mortal.

Notice that the news source this story came from is "apnews".   How appropriate.
             Jim Bell



Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3452 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20191109/ed05e9ec/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list