Anarcho-Tyranny in Oslo - Counter Currents' Greg Johnson arrest, and full speech - [PEACE]
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Sat Nov 9 05:42:46 PST 2019
So Counter Currents publisher Greg Johnson was arrested, and banned
from Norway, because he might say something TPTB don't like.
The story of his arrest is titled Anarcho-Tyranny in Oslo and is
found here:
https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/11/anarcho-tyranny-in-oslo/
And the full speech he intended to give in Oslo, is titled
"The Very Idea of White Privilege", and is found here:
http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/the-speech-greg-johnson-was-going-to-give-in-oslo-before-they-arrested-him-as-a-terrorist/
This para can be considered a tl;dr:
The main reason to reject the claim that America is a white
supremacist society is the fact that some non-white groups—chiefly
East Asians and certain communities of South Asians—do better than
whites in key indicators of success, such as educational
attainment, income, and law abidingness, and they did so before
anti-white discrimination and non-white tokenism became rampant. If
American whites were intent on creating systematic white privilege
and supremacy, we failed miserably. White racism is not a
sufficient explanation for differing racial outcomes in America.
Here is an extract:
A privilege is an advantage that you enjoy and others don’t.
Privilege is inherently unequal. Special privileges are the
opposite of equal rights. White privilege means advantages enjoyed
by whites just in virtue of their race—rights not enjoyed by
non-whites. White privilege is a form of hereditary privilege.
Whites do nothing to earn or merit white privilege over and above
simply being born. White privilege thus refers to a whole range of
unequal and unearned—and thus unjust—advantages enjoyed by whites
and denied to non-whites in the societies that whites created.
White privilege is just another word for white “racism.”
The concept of white privilege has exploded in American public
discourse in the last five years, coinciding with the so-called
“great awokening,” namely the wave of Left-wing hysteria and
gaslighting set off by the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown hoaxes,
namely the claims that two blacks who were killed while committing
crimes were actually the real victims, innocent victims of white
racism.
The concept of white privilege has provoked a great deal of
eye-rolling and healthy anger from whites. This manifestation of
white toughness has, absurdly, been termed “white fragility,” which
is a clear sign that the Left is not just out of touch with reality
but simply thinks that it can be conjured up or banished with word
magic.
Whites reject the idea of white privilege for various reasons.
- Some think that racism is a terrible thing, but they don’t
think that they or their societies are guilty of it.
- The vast majority of white people work very hard and never had
anything given to them, so they resent the idea that they
benefit from unearned privileges.
- Others think there is nothing wrong with racial inequality and
believe that white privilege is just another politically
correct moral swindle in which non-whites seek unearned
advantages by accusing good-hearted whites of spurious offenses
for which they can buy forgiveness.
But as much as I applaud this pushback against white privilege, the
concept is not entirely meaningless. For instance, within the
lifetimes of some people reading this, whites enjoyed legal
privileges denied to non-whites in Apartheid South Africa and the
American South.
But there is not a white society in the world today in which whites
enjoy such legal privileges over non-whites. Even the idea of
nationality through descent is being chipped away as a form of
privilege. Indeed, in South Africa and the United States,
non-whites now enjoy privileges over whites, both legally and
through massive private discrimination.
Yet, even with decades of official and unofficial non-white
privilege behind us, certain non-white groups are more likely than
whites to be uneducated, poor, and in trouble with the law—to name
just three important factors in overall social well-being.
The official explanation for these lingering inequalities is
“racism,” that is to say: white malevolence, as well as “systemic”
forms of inequality. According to this theory, since all peoples
want to thrive in white societies and have equal inherent potential
to do so, the fact that some groups conspicuously do not thrive
needs to be explained.
Since white people are the architects of these societies, they are
obviously the ones to blame. Thus white people must be hectored and
browbeaten and reeducated. We must be punished by affirmative
action and reparations. And we must endure having our societies
torn apart and rebuilt over and over again, until racial equality
is attained. Because nothing stands in the way of racial equality
except white institutions and ways of life, white ignorance and
ill-will, white guilt and white privilege—or so they say.
But it is increasingly difficult to believe this viewpoint because
legal white privileges have been overturned and replaced. White
privilege has not, moreover, been replaced by a classical liberal
meritocracy, in which all people are subject to the same rules and
judged on individual merit, but by a system of non-white privilege.
But even with the system rigged in their favor, some non-white
groups conspicuously lag behind whites in a vast number of indexes
of social well-being. (An excellent summation of these differences
is Richard Lynn’s The Global Bell Curve: Race, IQ, and Inequality
Worldwide [Augusta, Ga.: Washington Summit Publishers, 2008].)
Even though anti-racist activists and non-whites find it
increasingly difficult to point to any specific cause of persistent
inequality, they just know that it is somehow white people’s fault.
This is why the Left has resorted to increasingly “occult”—i.e.
hidden and mysterious—explanations for persistent racial
inequality.
Since fewer and fewer whites are consciously racist, the problem
must be unconscious racism somehow keeping certain groups down.
Unconscious racism is a real phenomenon, but how far does it
explain persistent inequality? (On unconscious racism, see Kevin
MacDonald’s “Psychology and White Ethnocentrism,” The Occidental
Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 4 [2006].)
https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v6n4/MacDonald.pdf
Since fewer and fewer whites hold negative racial stereotypes about
other groups, and non-whites are still displaying stereotypical
behavior, non-whites must be sabotaging themselves because of the
“threat,” the mere specter of negative stereotypes existing in
their own minds—and this is still white people’s fault, somehow.
Since explicit, legal racism has been dismantled and even reversed,
the legacy of past racism must still exert a subtle influence that
is powerful enough to cancel out the effects of much more recent
systems of non-white privilege, somehow.
The classic statement on white privilege is Peggy McIntosh’s 1989
essay, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,”
https://www.racialequitytools.org/resourcefiles/mcintosh.pdf
where she writes:
I have come to see white privilege as an invisible package of
unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but
about which I was “meant” to remain oblivious. White privilege is
like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions,
maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools, and blank
checks.
...
All of these “privileges” are simply aspects of having a
homogeneous homeland, of belonging to a community of people with
whom you share a common biological and cultural heritage. In white
societies, one can call this “white privilege.” But in Asian
societies, one would call it Asian privilege and in African
societies, African privilege. Furthermore, it is too crude to speak
about this simply in terms of broad racial categories. Instead, we
should speak about Norwegian privilege in Norway, Japanese
privilege in Japan, Swazi privilege in Swaziland, and the like. It
would also be nice to live in a world in which stateless peoples,
like Palestinians and Kurds, have similar privileges.
...
It is fun to visit foreign lands, but it can be alienating,
stressful, and psychologically exhausting to actually live in one,
and this is the everyday experience of minorities and stateless
peoples in other people’s homelands. The cure to this problem is to
give every people a land of their own where they can feel at home
rather than constantly alienated.
Many of McIntosh’s alleged privileges of being white are more
accurately described as the absence of the disadvantages of being
black. These include:
...
McIntosh describes black disadvantages as white privileges because
she wishes to absolve blacks for these problems and blame whites.
Unfortunately, many anti-black stereotypes—for instance, black
criminality and financial irresponsibility—are not just dreamed up
by evil-minded white people. They are based in experience. Of
course most blacks are not criminals and spendthrifts, but enough
of them are that it is rational for whites to be vigilant around
blacks they do not know, a burden of suspicion that falls equally
upon the problem minority and the blameless majority.
One of the central contentions of the Black Lives Matter movement
is that blacks are arrested for crimes at a greater rate than
whites simply because of white racism. But objective data shows
that blacks are arrested for crimes at pretty much the same rate
that they commit them. (See for instance, Edwin S. Rubenstein’s The
Color of Crime: Race, Crime, and Justice in America [Oakton, Vir.:
New Century Foundation, 2016].) Thus, if Black Lives Matter wishes
to lower the black arrest rate, they should work to lower the black
crime rate.
https://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Color-Of-Crime-2016.pdf
But there is not a single politician in America who has the courage
to simply tell blacks to commit fewer crimes. Instead, police
departments are being intimidated into giving blacks license to
break the law with impunity. Police are also more likely to use
violence with white suspects than blacks in comparable situations.
This is objectively a system of black privilege. (On Black Lives
Matter and the collapse of policing blacks, see Heather MacDonald’s
studies
https://www.city-journal.org/html/ferguson-effect-lives-14919.html
on “the Ferguson effect.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferguson_effect
On the over-policing of whites in America, including increased
chances of death by cop, see Richard Houck’s “Law Enforcement and
the Hostile Elite,” Counter-Currents, June 20, 2018.)
https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/06/law-enforcement-the-hostile-elite/
Blacks feel oppressed in white societies by negative white
stereotypes. But the most momentous of these stereotypes are based
on experience. Thus it is rational to use them as guides in dealing
with black strangers. Because of this, no amount of reeducation is
going to banish them. (For a more detailed discussion of the
rationality of experience-based prejudices, see the title essay
https://www.counter-currents.com/2015/12/in-defense-of-prejudice/
of my book In Defense of Prejudice.)
https://www.counter-currents.com/product/in-defense-of-prejudice/
As long as multiracial societies persist, whites will continue to
resent blacks for not living up to white standards, and blacks will
continue to resent whites for imposing alien standards. The
ethnonationalist solution to such irreconcilable differences is
racial divorce: the creation of homogeneous sovereign homelands, to
the extent that this is possible, for all distinct peoples who wish
to exercise this right. (I discuss the concepts of ethnonationalism
and homogeneity, and how they can be achieved humanely in The White
Nationalist Manifesto.
https://www.counter-currents.com/product/the-white-nationalist-manifesto/
Also see my essay, “Irreconcilable Differences: The Case for Racial
Divorce.”)
https://www.counter-currents.com/2015/03/irreconcilable-differences/
The main reason to reject the claim that America is a white
supremacist society is the fact that some non-white groups—chiefly
East Asians and certain communities of South Asians—do better than
whites in key indicators of success, such as educational
attainment, income, and law abidingness, and they did so before
anti-white discrimination and non-white tokenism became rampant. If
American whites were intent on creating systematic white privilege
and supremacy, we failed miserably. White racism is not a
sufficient explanation for differing racial outcomes in America.
We have an alternative hypothesis based on the science of Human
Biological Diversity. The differing levels of education, income,
and law-abidingness—to name just three factors—among racial groups
in America are precisely what we would predict given measurable
differences of IQ and sociopathic personality traits between the
races. For a survey of the effect of IQ on a wide range of social
outcomes, see Richard Lynn’s The Global Bell Curve. On racial
differences in personality traits beyond just IQ, including
psychopathy, see Michael Levin’s Why Race Matters (Oakton, Vir.:
New Century Books, 2016).
...
Different races really are different. That means that when
different races live in the same social system, subject to the same
laws, institutions, and incentives, some will inevitably flourish
better than others. There will never be a social system that is
equally conducive to the flourishing of all races and cultures.
Such inequalities will persist even if we institute remedial forms
of discrimination in favor of groups who lag behind.
...
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list