Georgian Monoliths - "population control" - 11k "scientists" - culling the herd - [PEACE]
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Wed Nov 6 14:48:54 PST 2019
A preferred solution is apparently on the Georgian Monoliths, and now
has wide, almost ubiquitous "scientist" support: "population control"
which is of course a euphemism for population culling (murder, to use
a normal word) (in original article, each quoted person is linked):
45 Population-Control Quotes That Expose The Elites' Plan To Cut
The Number Of People On The Planet
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/45-population-control-quotes-expose-elites-plan-cut-number-people-planet
http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/45-population-control-quotes-that-prove-the-elite-really-do-want-to-reduce-the-number-of-people-on-the-planet
... But if humans are the primary driver of climate change, and
if we only have about 12 years before we reach the point of no
return as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has suggested, will a
“gradual” reduction of the human population really be enough to
satisfy the climate change zealots? ...
1. Charles Darwin (his thinking is at the foundation of so many
of our scientific theories today): “At some future period, not
very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of
man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout
the world the savage races. At the same time the
anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has
remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then
be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more
civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some
ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the
negro or Australian and the gorilla.”
2. Bill Gates: “The problem is that the population is growing the
fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in
the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling
in population by 2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we
help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an
impossible situation later.”
3. Bernie Sanders: “In poor countries around the world where
women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies,
and where they can have the opportunity through birth control
to control the number of kids they have, is something I very,
very strongly support.”
4. UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson: “The primary challenge facing
our species is the reproduction of our species itself…It is
time we had a grown-up discussion about the optimum quantity
of human beings in this country and on this planet…All the
evidence shows that we can help reduce population growth, and
world poverty, by promoting literacy and female emancipation
and access to birth control.”
5. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “The human
population can no longer be allowed to grow in the same old
uncontrolled way. If we do not take charge of our population
size, then nature will do it for us.”
6. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W.
Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “Solving the
population problem is not going to solve the problems of
racism… of sexism… of religious intolerance… of war… of gross
economic inequality. But if you don’t solve the population
problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems.
Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to
solve it unless you also solve the population problem.”
7. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have
become a disease, the Humanpox.”
8. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million
people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
9. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso: about medical patients
with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think
it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless
you let them hurry up and die.”
10. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth
on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly
evident.”
11. Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide
enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind
homes, never mind roads, hospitals and schools.”
12. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the
optimum population providing the best quality of life for
all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting
bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer
people mean better lives.”
13. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted
suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the
freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the
planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”
14. Al Gore: “One of the things we could do about it is to change
the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to
stabilize the population, and one of the principal ways of
doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You
have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management
so women can choose how many children to have, the spacing of
the children… You have to educate girls and empower women.
And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that
happens, then the population begins to stabilize and
societies begin to make better choices and more balanced
choices.”
15. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of
trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion,
is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop
as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which
humans will level off on earth.”
16. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known
solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our
population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and
eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually
reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources.
Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing
global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies,
immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one
front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing
global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in
1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes
brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a
time making her individual choices. The speed of this
childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological
programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to
date.”
17. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper
entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending
human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but
not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global
climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human
numbers may be necessary in order to do so.“
18. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin
Eric R. Pianka: “I have two grandchildren and I want them to
inherit a stable Earth. But I fear for them. Humans have
overpopulated the Earth and in the process have created an
ideal nutritional substrate on which bacteria and viruses
(microbes) will grow and prosper. We are behaving like
bacteria growing on an agar plate, flourishing until natural
limits are reached or until another microbe colonizes and
takes over, using them as their resource. In addition to our
extremely high population density, we are social and mobile,
exactly the conditions that favor growth and spread of
pathogenic (disease-causing) microbes. I believe it is only a
matter of time until microbes once again assert control over
our population, since we are unwilling to control it
ourselves. This idea has been espoused by ecologists for at
least four decades and is nothing new. People just don’t
want to hear it.”
19. Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General from 1997-2006: “The idea
that population growth guarantees a better life — financially
or otherwise — is a myth that only those who sell nappies,
prams and the like have any right to believe.”
20. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UN Under-Secretary-General from
2000-2010: “We cannot confront the massive challenges of
poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction unless
we address issues of population and reproductive health.”
21. Bill Nye: “In 1750, there were about a billion humans in the
world. Now, there are well over seven billion people in the
world. It more than doubled in my lifetime. So all these
people trying to live the way we live in the developed world
is filling the atmosphere with a great deal more carbon
dioxide and other greenhouse gases than existed a couple of
centuries ago. It’s the speed at which it is changing that is
going to be troublesome for so many large populations of
humans around the world.”
22. Actress Cameron Diaz: “I think women are afraid to say that
they don’t want children because they’re going to get
shunned. But I think that’s changing too now. I have more
girlfriends who don’t have kids than those that do. And,
honestly? We don’t need any more kids. We have plenty of
people on this planet.”
23. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels.
Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start
allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing,
by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will
swamp the federal budget.”
24. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for
Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in
One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the
elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our
disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old
people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent
cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When
the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter
is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in
terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”
25. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our
problems are the result of overbreeding among the working
class”
26. Gloria Steinem: “Everybody with a womb doesn’t have to have a
child any more than everybody with vocal chords has to be an
opera singer.”
27. Jane Goodall: “It’s our population growth that underlies just
about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted
on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty
things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would
take care of it — but there are so many of us.”
28. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I
had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was
concern about population growth and particularly growth in
populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
29. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most
merciful thing that the large family does to one of its
infant members is to kill it.”
30. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article
entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not
equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk
about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving,
kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet
a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as
the woman in whose body it resides.”
31. Paul Ehrlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of
solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate
solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The
other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the
death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.”
32. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne,
Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of
Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical
Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that
they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth
abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this
practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’
to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed
is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a
child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be
ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion
would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn
has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but
the well-being of the family is at risk.”
33. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to
continue to decrease the growth rate of the global
population; the planet can’t support many more people.”
34. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John Holdren: “A
program of sterilizing women after their second or third
child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the
operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than
trying to sterilize men.”
35. Another quote from John Holdren: “If population control
measures are not initiated immediately and effectively, all
the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the
misery to come.”
36. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra
Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against
society, unless the parents hold a government license … All
potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive
chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens
chosen for childbearing.”
37. Maurice Strong: “Either we reduce the world’s population
voluntarily or nature will do this for us, but brutally.”
38. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department
Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind
all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either
governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or
they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador,
or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem.
Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian
government, even fascism, to reduce it…”
39. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about
sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that
control population, because the ecological crisis, in short,
is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there
aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological
damage.”
40. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we
must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing
to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
41. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a
button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without
hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”
42. Author Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound
that all of us need to ask what should be done.”
43. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder
of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am
reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in
order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
44. Ashley Judd: “It’s unconscionable to breed, with the number
of children who are starving to death in impoverished
countries.”
45. Charles Darwin: “With savages, the weak in body or mind are
soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a
vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other
hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we
build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we
institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost
skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There
is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved
thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have
succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised
societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to
the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be
highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how
soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the
degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of
man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his
worst animals to breed.”
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 11:31:38PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 09:11:56PM +1000, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> > We cannot support a world population of billions without large amounts of
> > energy. Green energy projects invariably mean less energy, which invariably
> > shuts down people's lifestyles. People want to continue traveling around,
> > hence the riots in Chile.
> >
> > If warmists believed a word of their own bullshit, the money received for
> > carbon offset credits would be spent on actually offsetting carbon emissions,
> > for example by pulverizing olivine rocks and dumping them in the shallow
> > ocean, stimulating the natural process where by calcium silicates get
> > converted into silica and calcium carbonate.
> >
> > Instead carbon credits money is spent on jetsetting around the world to
> > pontificate on global warming.
> >
> > If warmists believed a word of their own bullshit, green energy projects would
> > produce useful energy, instead of superior holiness.
> >
> > What green energy projects produce is shakedowns of the power grid. You get
> > higher energy prices, and frequently get blackouts and brownouts.
> >
> > We could in fact produce the required energy without carbon emissions either
> > using nuclear power, or by mining olivine to offset the carbon emitted by
> > burning coal or oil, but the warmists have shown zero interest in actually
> > producing energy without emitting net carbon.
> >
> > That green energy projects never actually work shows that warmists do not in
> > fact believe what they purport to believe.
> >
> > Some of them want to murder billions of people,
>
>
> This is in fact true (task of the day: identify these "11,000
> experts" and make their identification public, if not already done so
> - these 11,000 "experts" need exposing, evidently):
>
> 11,000 Experts Propose Final Solution To Global Warming: Just Kill
> Billions Of People
> https://www.zerohedge.com/health/11000-experts-make-modest-proposal-end-global-warming-just-kill-billions-people
>
> Over 40 years ago, scientists from 50 nations pivoted on a
> longstanding "global cooling" thesis that was going to blanket
> the earth in ice, and instead adopted what was then called the
> "CO2-climate problem" which would lead to theories on global
> warming, rising tides and economic catastrophe.
>
> "Now, four decades later, a larger group of scientists is
> sounding another, much more urgent alarm," according to
> Bloomberg.
> https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/scientists-call-for-population-control-in-mass-climate-alarm
>
> Some 11,000 scientists call for population control in mass
> climate alarm https://t.co/7L2cD3tK6e
> pic.twitter.com/Fv7br3iAU7
> — Bloomberg Economics (@economics) November 5, 2019
>
> Over 11,000 experts from around the world have banded together to
> call for solutions to the the 'climate emergency,' including
> population control - which "must be stabilized—and, ideally,
> gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social
> integrity."
>
> "We declare, with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from
> around the world, clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is
> facing a climate emergency," warned the scientists in the Tuesday
> edition of BioScience, in a report that includes lots of scary
> charts we're guessing Tony Heller could have some fun with.
> https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biz088/5610806
> https://realclimatescience.com/2019/04/who-is-tony-heller/
>
> The solution? Fewer people!
>
> When absorbed in sequence, the charts lay out a devastating
> trend for planetary health. From meat consumption, greenhouse
> gas emissions and ice loss to sea-level rise and extreme
> weather events, they lay out a grim portrait of 40 years of
> squandered opportunities.
>
> The scientists make specific calls for policymakers to quickly
> implement systemic change to energy, food, and economic
> policies. But they go one step further, into the politically
> fraught territory of population control. It “must be
> stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework
> that ensures social integrity,” they write. -Bloomberg
> https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/scientists-call-for-population-control-in-mass-climate-alarm
>
> "We are encouraged by a recent surge of concern," reads the
> letter. "Governmental bodies are making climate emergency
> declarations. Schoolchildren are striking. Ecocide lawsuits are
> proceeding in the courts. Grassroots citizen movements are
> demanding change, and many countries, states and provinces,
> cities, and businesses are responding.
>
> Perhaps world leaders will consult with China, which has
> reportedly been sterilizing Muslim women in their infamous
> reeducation camps.
> https://nypost.com/2019/08/13/muslim-women-reportedly-sterilized-in-chinese-re-education-camps/
>
>
>
> > some of them want to seize the
> > means of production, and most of them want to shake down the energy grid.
> >
> > Revealed preference is that actually reducing CO2 emissions is mighty low on
> > their list of priorities - or at least reducing CO2 emissions in ways that do
> > not destroy industrial civilization and result in the deaths of billions of
> > people is mighty low on their list of priorities.
>
>
> Millenials, listen up!:
>
> Buy all the things.
>
> Eat all the bugs, for all their protein.
>
> Kill all the babies.
>
> Have all the fun.
>
> Ride all the cocks.
>
> Bang all the chicks.
>
> Pay all the tax.
>
> Believe all the 11,000 experts.
>
> Continue to be all the sheeple.
>
>
> Glad we got THAT sorted!
>
> Ride on, Georgian Monoliths, ride on!
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list