Defining God

[Rob Avina]

Why have we not yet, within science, defined a God?  Would it ruin
religion, could it make science a religion, will it ruin the concept of
superheros?  Would it make us, have a belief in something bigger than
ourselves, therefore in our own selves more?  A cornerstone AA.

Simple.Wikipedia has a definition.

"According to certain religions and mythologies, God is the creator of the
Earth and of everything else..."

But what if we just made it real.  Just. Describe it, as such.  It doesn't
define any more or less, the basis for any or even all, the meat of, what
most consider religions to be about.  It provides the real, human beings,
the only ones so far that we know of of course, whom are trying to follow
these often millennia old rules, ones we probably helped make... A chance,
to at least be working together in doing so.  Keeping it simple, and meant
to be very additive.

So here goes, based on my 45 year analysis, elimination and awareness of
most; currently, otherwise described, concepts:

God, née, god - That, which surrounds all; within, detectable totality,
inhabits us, and governs all unknown laws of our universe.

Then link the people, with something like this(check both tabs at the
bottom left):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wq_ktBYW_-jS1nkZh-W0unt06-f0nW6mmYZ3tfQaWiI/edit?usp=sharing

I suppose this may be considered really, a very bad idea, by some.  I(just
me and, Alex Trebek, maybe, he likes his facts like I like my steak, a
little rare!) for one certainly prefer it to ...  lets say, AP.  AP seems
like a real PA.  That stands for a "Pain in the ASS"  Or "Pisspoor
Attitude", or "Political Assassination" something long trending,
#unfortunately, and not at all new, nor newsworthy.  Nowadays the
Assassin's name would probably be withheld anyway.  Mostly thought, I find
it irresponsible and reprehensible, to suggest, that killing people is the
way out of our modern day towards the future.  Positive acts, should affect
positive change.  It would seem, that AP, takes away that choice from the
masses, much like any assassin.  Reasons agnostic.  Given a chance, I
think, one would like to believe the wise thing to do is eventually NOT
fight, and therefore not need to kill, right?  Maybe even get a little
help, maybe a lot, from the correct others.  For preservation of our
collective  genetic's sake, if nothing else.  It is what intelligent beings
would do most often, is all it seems to me.  Now that we have a chance, and
the ability, to talk.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2779 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20191106/bc7dbc90/attachment.txt>