Whom, specifically, is our greatest ally? - (spoiler: Australia) - [PEACE]

jim bell jdb10987 at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 2 22:13:09 PDT 2019


 On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 08:11:34 PM PDT, Razer <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:
 

On November 2, 2019 5:28:58 AM PDT, Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
>>For those who missed the memo, in Australia, "cunt" is the most
>>endearing term used between two blokes who are great friends and have
>>been for a long time.
>
>Between absolutely anyone else at all, the word is one of, if not
>>the, worst possible slurs.
>
>>When in polite company, it is strongly advisable to not use the term
>>at all, even when your best long term friend rocks up, since others
>>may not take so kindly to such colloquial speach in such situations.

>Aussie Thomas Violence says:

>"I love little cultural differences, like how Americans are super offended by the word cunt but here in Australia we're super offended by school children being slaughtered with automatic weapons"
Sure he said that!  The current difference between America and Australia is that the latter generally banned guns a few years ago, and mostly America hasn't done that.  It's called the "Second Amendment", and my interpretation fairly closely agrees with the 2008 Supreme Court case D.C. v. Heller.  I think that in America, gun laws cannot Constitutionally be any stricter that they were in 1789, when the Bill of Rights of voted, and 1791, when it was ratified by states.  That's the meaning of the term "infringed", with its root-word "fringe".  
I assert that this means that the RTKBA cannot be further limited, even around the "fringed".  Why this wording?  Well, if the wording had says, "the right to keep and bear a gun shall not be denied", some slick politician some day would decide that if 'they' banned any gun with more power than 1/4 of a 0.22 pistol, they still hadn't actually DENIED people's rights to own a gun, used singular.   Slick.
I can remember about 1966, when "Texas Tower Shooter" Charles Whitman shot people.   It shocked the nation, not merely due to the violence, but because at that time it seemed to be such an astonishing act.   "What has changed", we should ask?  America doesn't have that many more people (and guns) than we did in 1966.  

>Later, on twitter: "heaps of replies i'd like to get to here but i have to turn off the notifications, i'm too busy denying christ, implementing white genocide, making christmas illegal, kneeling during the anthem, and reading up on the automatic gun known as the Assault Rifle 15"
Would we know if that email barrage was actually just a 'false-flag' flood by people simulating some other group of people harassing somebody?   "Fake hate crimes" are extremely common, primarily because they are easy to simulate, and if the person doing that is halfway intelligent, he or she probably won't get caught.   ("Hide the noose in your pocket, walk to the door, look around to make sure nobody is looking and there are no security cameras, and then drop the noose!  Try not to leave any DNA!")

thomas violence on Twitter

Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail

| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
thomas violence on Twitter

“I love little cultural differences, like how Americans are super offended by the word cunt but here in Australi...
 |

 |

 |



  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 9456 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20191103/a9417f01/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list