Low speed, p2p, wireless as a secure alternative to SMS and Signal-like services.

[Steven Schear]

Military SIGINT has historically relied heavily on intel agency resources.
I think the following article is less a bid to get increased funding or
disinformation than a realistic appraisal of how the emergence of low cost
COTS signal processing has asymmetrically shifted the advantage from the
U.S. to guerrillas.

https://breakingdefense.com/2019/11/electronic-warfare-better-but-still-not-good-enough/


On Mon, Oct 28, 2019, 9:17 PM Punk - Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:33:28 +0000
> Steven Schear <schear.steve at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Despite massive SIGINT investments she is at disadvantage but the
> > intel agency narratives would have others believe they are all-seeing
> > all-knowing.
>
>         the same 'intelligence' agency, aka the americunt govcorp, will
> have you believe that their honeypots like the tor network are 'safe' and
> 'protect the human rights of 'journalists''
>
>         so what's needed here is actual knowdlegde of their 'capabilities.
> Your assumption that they are just bragging is complete bullshit.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1673 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20191101/eb29ed3c/attachment.txt>