Zerowedgie: Association Of American Physicians & Surgeons [1943] "Strongly Opposes" Mandatory Vaccines
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Fri Mar 8 23:38:41 PST 2019
A high-level org suggesting individual liberty, autonomy, and
parental choice about child-rearing. Very well written, fact backed
'public' letter by the way... in My Extremely High Opinion of course
;)
The Association Of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS)
"Strongly Opposes" Mandatory Vaccines
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-06/association-american-physicians-surgeons-strongly-opposes-mandatory-vaccines
https://aapsonline.org/measles-outbreak-and-federal-vaccine-mandates/?fbclid=IwAR14tPRiZV1l6KSINFXguIacuJBr68XytbAnxGDNYhGw1q_jjiCkCH_QLBQ
To: Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and
Commerce Committee
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates
Feb. 26, 2019
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions,
including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the
risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the
right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of
medical practice is a state function, not a federal one.
Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about
accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious
intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental
decisions about child-rearing.
A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on
mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to
justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks?
Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a
one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an
involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a
voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of
death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There
are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a
much lower risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for
vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of
subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated
control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline,
not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and
consideration of all adverse health events (including
neurodevelopment disorders).
Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme
Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be
surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so
devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a
multimillion-dollar damage award.
The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now,
despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given
only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as
veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn
from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese
market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The
acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though
somewhat less effective.
The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of
disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These
must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a
government agency.
Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates,
and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable
illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are
occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected
individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority,
but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not
been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust,
life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred
in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention(CDC). Are potential measles complications including
death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune
deficiency a justification for revoking the rights of all
Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater
restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical
interventions? Clearly not.
Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are
listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal
relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report
by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of
safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and
post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National
Vaccine Information Center).
Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate
to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary
of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that
because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are
unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease
control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed
consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.
Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of
near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive.
Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in
pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases,
because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose
vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer
receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to
protect them during their most vulnerable period.
Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced
vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health
measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a
more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all
needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might
do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed
patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated
people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick
themselves.
Issues that Congress must consider:
∙ Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so
the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished.
Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product
believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in
preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal
is the only incentive to do better.
∙ There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative
relationships with vaccine purveyors.
∙ Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being
quashed, as is dissent by professionals.
∙ There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects
from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains
and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or
rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may
have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain
live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s
brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the
complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.
∙ Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are
they the only available means to control the spread of
disease.
AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and
parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although
potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their
movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others
against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no
exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a
clear or present danger.
AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties
nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine
and the patient-physician relationship.
Respectfully yours,
Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list