Google Fucking with Leak Search Results, Yacy Search Collectives Rising Up

Punk punks at tfwno.gf
Mon Jun 24 12:31:33 PDT 2019


On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:47:12 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> A continuously operating computer to probe (give search tasks to) search engines to qualify and quantify their biases.

	yeah but you're assuming that such biases can be detected by some piece of code. The assumpion is flawed. 

	As a side note a while back I saw a site that tracked changes in news articles. You could see for instance how articles at guardian.com were 'updated' to make excuses for previous lies etc. 
	
	funnily enough, now I can't find that site using google-nsa...


> And as to "unobvious":.  You may claim to that the biases are "in there, somewhere".   But that won't satisfy everyone, many of whom will want to see the specifics.


	But people who are blatantly biased towards the status quo won't admit they are biased. No computer is going to fix that. People who think the so called MSM isn't biased are obviously hopeless. Why would they listen to accusations of bias in NSA-GCHQ search engines or any other part of the internet spying machine? 






>         Jim Bell 
>  
>   On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:40, Punk<punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:   On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:55:02 +0000 (UTC)
> jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > By now, shouldn't there exist an automated, continuous "search engine bias checker" at work, looking for these kinds of unobvious biases?
> 
>     what do you mean, automated? How do you think such automated system would work? 
> 
>     And what do you mean by 'unobvious'? If there's any self evident truth, that is the fact that americunt internet companies are completly rogue and are the propaganda arm of the  rogue americunt government. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list