California Penal Code 12355

[Punk-Stasi 2.0]

On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 15:25:58 -0500
grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 1) See above... it's not $10 anymore, it's now respectively
> scaled to "$significant to you", so it can't be dodged as triviality.


	It wasn't 'dodged'. Your use of term 'dodged' however shows that you missed the point. 


> 
> > to never have to deal with the person again.
> 
> 2a) No, if there is no repurcussion, they'll likely keep coming back.


	lawl - look at the nonsense write. If you lend $10 to guy and he doesn't pay back then you don't lend him anymore. Furthermore, it only cost you $10 to learn that the guy isn't trustable. 


> 
> 2b) Then it becomes beyond $significant to you, for which
> the original question remains.


	'significant to you' is still vague. Anyway, you keep asking for people to solve your problems. Solve them yourself while keeping in mind that you're not allowed to violate personal rights.