Free Assange: Assange in Belmarsh

[grarpamp]

On 8/26/19, Douglas Lucas <dal at riseup.net> wrote:
>> Legends
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECys5ZnWkAAO2ZD.jpg
>
> What about his face and upper body is of importance? Why is it his image
> memorable, whereas specific of leaked documents and actions taken as a
> result are forgettable? Every email about Assange is an email not about
> a leaked document ,when weighing that scale of opprortunity cost, what
> for you regarding Julian's upper musculature, tendons, facial hair,
> persuades you to continue the quest to make him the most famous
> individual ever to have lived during the exterimination of humanity? Or
> you yet another Goebbels victim - repeat something often enough and it
> becomes the truth - and gorged by WikiLeaks advertising, fearful or
> perhaps aroused by @WLTaskForce -- you no longer think and can be
> nothing but an unpaid repeater station for not even Assange, not even
> that mammal in Belmarsh, but rather, a mere visual-digital
> represetnation of Assange? You describe assange as a legend and yet he
> does not know who you are and you cannot even procure a face to face
> meeting with your idol, you must be content with merely a jpeg.
>
> Who is the most famous individual in the world currently? What
> individual has been the most famous individual in the world for the
> longest period of time? For example, you might imagine individual A has
> been the most famous person in the world, but only for 5 days, whereas
> individual B in a different century has been the most famous person in
> the world, and maintained that unfortunate position for a full five
> years. That's including only living humans. People's fame might continue
> after death, or may even precede birth in the case of dynasties,
> prophecies. Also what of other primates or mammals? Is the dog Laika (a
> canine) more famous still than even your beloved Julian? If so, will you
> take arms against a sea of troubles to ensure than Julian is more famous
> than Laika after your and his death (Laika is already eliminated)? How
> much will you be paid, in cash, bitcoin, or upvotes, for day in and day
> out -- as people in Assange circle -- sharing images of Julian, Kristinn
> Hraffson, gazing so deeply at their faces
>
> -- and what about his face and upper body is it that is of importance? I
> need some clarification from those wh compulsively, repeatedly, and
> eternally share his images. Is it his irises that you have a bro crush
> on? Or is it his shoulders? Might it be his nose? I wish someone would
> explain in particular what it is that confers upon his visual aspect
> value --
>
> while of course cables, emails, and other leaked documents languish
>
> When in 2050 human civilization collapses, and without tap water you
> walk outside to begin migrating across the highways as your neighbors
> complain with open carry, you will turn to your loved one (if you have
> any, which is a stretch) and say:
>
> "We saw all this end of civilization coming, we had the documents, we
> did nothing. But oh! Oh! There is one thing we so profoundly recall, the
> one take away, the bottom line of my life, now without food clothing an
> d shelter: A man who I have never met, Julian Assange, I remember: his
> face. He of course has food clothing and shelter, I do not, but it has
> been my lot in life, to retweet my betters and to share images of him"