Will De Blasio "tax the hell" out of the super rich"?

[Punk]

On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:55:02 +1000
Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:


> 
> It's certainly not a "fundamental human right" to be able to invest
> in an entity representing a "collection of other humans" and have
> your liability limited to the amount you invested.


	limited liability is bullshit, FULL STOP. You pay for all the damage you cause. 



> > 
> > 	And yet AP hasn't happened. Maybe your system doesn't work? 
> 
> An idea like that, needs to become viral if it is to become a new
> dominant societal system. Perhaps AP has a lack of sufficient
> virality, or perhaps there's a lack of the required infrastructure -
> non de-anonymizable (i.e. truly anonymous) digital currencies? IDK.


	The idea that needs to go viral is anarchy, not AP.



> >  
> > >>   And in the real world we live in, ruled by CORPORATISM, the rich obtained their money thanks to the government. This is the ABC of libertarianism. If you don't believe me I suggest you look at the evidence : 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Then a good solution is to eliminate the government(s) that corporations can/do use to obtain power.  
> > 
> > 	Right. Meanwhile some people should stop pretending that corporations are not part of the government and FULLY LIABLE for their crimes and the crimes of their partners, the government. 
> 
> I think you missed Bell's point - 


	I beg to fully disagree. 


> libertarians don't give up a
> concept simply because that concept is currently misused, 

	What concept. Privileges? Not libertarian. Limited liability? Not libertarian. Defending big business? Not libertarian.