latest false flag attack?
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 12:05:02 PDT 2018
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:40:52 +0100
Peter Fairbrother <peter at tsto.co.uk> wrote:
> On 24/09/18 00:13, juan wrote:
> > especially dedicated to agent fairbrother, 'expert' on metals
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGYrFxOL0vY
> One ought to learn to sort out the obviously bullshit.
> Begins: "Never before or after 9/11 have steel framed buildings
> collapsed due to fire".
> Unfortunately that is simply not true; nor relevant to what purports to
> be a comparison between WTC and Windsor Tower, as Windsor Tower was not
oops - true. You must be happy you earned 1 debating point =)
Still, speaking of obvious bullshit :
> Put that another way - *it was rated so that it _would_ collapse after 3
> (or so) hours of major conflagration*.
Did you show us the 'design docs' stating that 'WTC' would collapse after 3 hours?
for reference : 1 of the towers lasted 56 minutes, the other one 1 hour 40 minutes and building 7 stood for ~7 hours. I guess "3" can mean anything then.
More information about the cypherpunks