latest false flag attack?
juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 22 11:50:18 PDT 2018
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 03:02:49 +0100
Peter Fairbrother <peter at tsto.co.uk> wrote:
> On 21/09/18 20:00, juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:20:19 +0100
> > Peter Fairbrother <peter at tsto.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> WTC was rated for 3 hours major fire resistance.
> >>
> >> Put that another way - *it was rated so that it _would_ collapse after 3
> >> (or so) hours of major conflagration*.
> >>
> >> It's in the design docs.
> >
> >
> > Where's your evidence for that claim Peter? WHERE are those 'design docs' ?
>
> Can't be bothered to look up any original references, and they need a
> lawyer to interpret anyway,
OK - So you don't have any reference for the claim and you admit that even if there was, it can mean anything, according to 'lawyers' .
Thank you.
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list