Tommy Robinson: "I was already offered, if I plead guilty I will not go to prison; I cannot do it!" - [PEACE]

[Zenaan Harkness]

Doh! Link to audio interview with Tommy Robinson:
https://sputniknews.com/radio/201810121068837137-jon-gaunt-tommy-robinson-exclusive/

Bonus - they even did a transcript:
https://sputniknews.com/interviews/201810121068834490-tommy-robinson-britain/




On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 09:37:19PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Tommy Robinson lays out his treatment at the hands of the UK
> "justice" system, their courts and "law" (abominable legal process)
> and that he's been offered that he will not go to jail again, on his
> (illegal, without precedent) retrial, if he will just plead guilty.
> 
> Tommy Robinson: “I said to my wife, "I cannot do it, no matter what!"”
> 
> 
> Well done Tommy - you're setting a Haverbeck-tier example.
> 
> Just like not signing an "unconditional" bail and doing 7 months "at
> her majesty's pleasure" for the privilege of standing for the right
> of free and unfettered passage.
> 
> 
> Nice to see a few goy starting to stand.
> 
> 
> 
> Here's the thing though, and let's take the German Haverbeck example
> rather than the UK or Aussie example:
> 
> 1)
> So (((they))) brought in a despotic law, in the German case, making a
> criminal offence out of even the mere questioning of the "Holocaust"
> (truly, the Holohoax).
> 
> 2)
> Grandma Haverbeck lives her right, the right to put forward/ publish
> the facts she has access to, along with her right to publicly ask a
> few, rather difficult, questions, for a random example "gas death
> chambers" with rickety wooden paling fence gates rather than sealed
> steel doors.
> 
> 3)
> On the second instance, Haverbeck is slammed in the clink.
> 
> And the point is this:
> 
>  - Imagine a few dozen people all publicly stating that they
>    genuinely have the same Haverbeck question.
> 
>  - They do this publicly, ensuring media coverage and very public
>    unanimous voices.
> 
> A few dozen is no longer a lone, unsupported, "conspiracy theorist"
> or whatever ad-hom term is used in the German law, perhaps
> "offender".
> 
> A few dozen is heard around the world.
> 
> A few dozen, treated to such a "legal" spectacle inspires 100s if not
> 1000s of fellow goy to add their voices to the front runners.
> 
> 
> NOW the evil law may well be overturned, for example with a wave of
> the magical declaration wand of the high court "This law is no longer
> enforceable."
> 
> 
> Surely discarding the cloak of fear has to be one of the greatest
> "internal shackles" liberations possible before passing from this
> world, no matter "win", "lose" or draw?
>