Request to mailing list cryptography rejected

Zenaan Harkness zen at
Sat Mar 24 19:07:15 PDT 2018

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:09:54PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:57:40 -0400
> grarpamp <grarpamp at> wrote:
> > What are your suggestions as to recourse?
> 	No point in talking to people who do not listen. LIKE YOU.
> 	So when you let me know that you actually read and thought
> 	abpit what I wrote to you, I might continue. 

I think grarpamp reactively missed your apropos rhetoric "Your
recourse against scum like metzger or any other censor
is...what...use a FREE channel?" - perhaps since you emboldened the
word "FREE" and so he missed that you were NOT doing reverse
psychology and simply pointing out the obvious irony that now he's
using a free (uncensored) comms channel.

Which is in fact the solution, and yes, which grarpamp seems to be
missing - The Ministry's programming is so powerful, that even
"logical" thinkers like grarpamp miss the obvious (I'm guessing he
still wants censorship, does not want the responsibility of being a
censor himself, so wants someone else to do the censoring, but wants
them to censor in just the way he wants the censoring to be so
censored - namely, that he personally does not get censored).

Yes, it is hilarious.

Grarpamp could start a brissdowner fork, with his royal self the
censor to show how censorship should REALLY be done - He only needs a
great title to give authority to His Royal Self so the plebes bow
low, massa, very low!

How about

  Grarpamp, Royal Hilarion of Sublime Censorship

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list