Anarchocrapitalism, "libertardianism", et al.

[juan]

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:30:37 +1000
jamesd at echeque.com wrote:

> jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> >> white males are superior soldiers to any
> >> other race by far.
> 
> On 1/5/2018 2:58 AM, juan wrote:
> > 	in other words, they are the worst scum on the planet, by
> > far.
> 
> Scum make criminals.  The virtues required for a warrior are the most 
> honorable virtues of them all.
> 
> There is a very large difference between the man who mugs you in an 
> alley, and the man who takes care of the mugger.


	there is indeed a  large difference between a honest mugger
	who mugs you in an alley and a soldier. The soldier being a
	hundred times more dangerous, more corrupt and a bigger coward. 

	Ever heard of that guy spooner that you link in your site? 


	"The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a
	man: Your money, or your life. And many, if not most, taxes are
	paid under the compulsion of that threat.

	The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely
	place, spring upon him from the road side, and, holding a
	pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets. But the
	robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is
	far more dastardly and shameful.

	The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility,
	danger, and crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he
	has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use
	it for your own benefit. He does not pretend to be anything but
	a robber. He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be
	merely a “protector,” and that he takes men’s money against
	their will, merely to enable him to “protect” those infatuated
	travellers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or
	do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection. He is too
	sensible a man to make such professions as these. Furthermore,
	having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do.
	He does not persist in following you on the road, against your
	will; assuming to be your rightful “sovereign,” on account of
	the “protection” he affords you. He does not keep “protecting”
	you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring
	you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you
	of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or
	pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor,
	and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without
	mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. He
	is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and
	insults, and villanies as these. In short, he does not, in
	addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or
	his slave."