Anarchocrapitalism, "libertardianism", et al.

[jamesd at echeque.com]

>> Lots of white people, myself among them, flipped houses.

On 1/7/2018 8:33 AM, juan wrote:
> 	thanks for personally admitting that you are a thieving scammer.

Buying something and selling it is not theft, nor is it a scam if the 
thing is as it is represented to be.

The thieving scammers were those who purchased houses with no intention 
or ability to repay the mortgage - people who purchased houses with no 
assets.  And you cannot purchase a house with no assets, unless you are 
a beneficiary of affirmative action.

Thus precisely zero white males or married white women were thieving 
scammers in housing boom.

The financial crisis was the result of dud mortgages.

The dud mortgages, all of them, were affirmative action mortgages.  What 
drove the housing boom is that *if* *you* *were* *a* *beneficiary* *of* 
*affirmative* *action* *then* you could buy an expensive house despite 
being stone broke.

The housing boom was the result of affirmative action mortgages.

White males were involved in this process only as flipping houses with 
the intent of unloading the houses on affirmative action purchasers.

A white male would buy a house with the intention and capability of 
paying the mortgage if things went bad, but with the expectation that he 
could unload on an affirmative action borrower before things went bad.

And for the most part, that is exactly what we did.

And the reason we chose to do this is that we know that white males are 
forced to honor contracts, while affirmative action beneficiaries can 
walk away with no problems.

So we, unlike the end purchasers, told the truth and honored all agreements.

The housing boom was the result of affirmative action loans.  The 
financial crisis was the result dud mortgages.  The dud mortgages, all 
of them, were affirmative action loans.