Personal attacks etc (was Re: USA: National Security Strategy...)

[juan]

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:45:04 +1000
jamesd at echeque.com wrote:

> On 1/5/2018 1:15 PM, juan wrote:
> > 	What I am getting at, is that the biggest thieves on the
> > planet are 'white'. 
> 
> Only if you declare all capitalists and all kulaks are thieves. 


	For the purpose of this exercise I declare all
	scum on wall street to be thieves.

	I further note that  wall street scum is mostly
	anglo-white-jewish. There are no blacks on wall street, you
	know...

	And I then note that your bullshit about blacks and crime is
	both incredibly dishonest and incredibly stupid because a
	casual look at 'race' and crime shows that whites got the
	world record on crime.

	Overall I notice that  your rants about people not
	respecting property rights are laughably biased. You seem to
	whine about street muggers and SOME statists while being
	completly blind to what the biggest statist thieves on the
	planet do. 

	In other words, you don't have a leg to stand on and just
	parrot right wing propaganda of the white supremacist kind.

	Oh and by the way, wall street's motto is "private gains,
	socialized losses" - guess which other political mafia has that
	modus operandi? your beloved commies. 



> if
> one thinks that wealth earned from property and enterprise is
> legitimate, non Jewish white thieves are absolutely insignificant
> compared to thieves of every other major race.

	nonsense - make the list of white banks - I bet they are bigger
	than the joo banks

	as to other non-banking, mercantilistic criminal organizations,
	of course lots of them are run and owned by white criminals.

	This is the ABC of LIBERTARIAN economics, which correctly
	sees privileged businesses as thieves who steal from
	consumers. 




> 
> And even if you declare that all capitalists are thieves, looks like
> the number and wealth of East Asian capitalists and kulaks is
> approximately equal to the number and wealth of non Jewish
> capitalists and kulaks.
> 
> > 	hispanic? do you mean that the CEOs of american banks were
> > 	'hispanic'(whatever the fuck 'hispanic') means?
> 
> 
> "Hispanic" means that Angelo Mozilo got charge of a bank by
> affirmative action, and got other banks handed to his control by
> affirmative action.


	oh you got one 'hispanic' in the whole history of american
	banking? 
	
	anyway, my point remains, there are lots of white, non joo
	banks. 



> 
> Initially a white anglo guy had the real control, and Angelo Mozillo
> was just there for the bank to get favorable treatment by the
> regulators, the token minority with the big desk in the big office,
> but no meaningful stuff in his in tray, but then his sponsor retired,
> Angelo Mozilo got real charge of the bank, and totally screwed
> everything up.
> 
> And then he got real charge of a bunch of other banks, thanks to 
> escalating favorable treatment by the regulators.
> 
> And then proceeded to run his bank, and the entire banking system,
> into the ground in the great Minority Mortgage Meltdown.
> Subsequently he faced a bunch of criminal charges for numerous
> fraudulent activities, bribery, and corruption.  Hard to say if he
> was actually criminal and fraudulent, or just too hopelessly
> incompetent to do banking regulatory paperwork correctly and keep
> proper track of bank assets. (Which assets tended to disappear into
> his pockets and the pockets of the regulators, which tendency
> definitely hints at crime, fraud, and corruption, or at least a
> curious level of forgetfulness on his part and the part of the
> regulators.   Search for "Friends of Angelo" to get more details.)
> 
> > 
> > 	again, no, I'd assume the CEOs of citibank, morgan stanley,
> > BoA etc etc are mostly 'white'.
> 
> You would be wrong:  CEO Citigroup who fucked up during the great 
> mortgage minority meltdown and stole everything not nailed down, was 
> Vikram Shankar Pandit, South Asian.
> 
> South Asians are massively over-represented when financial crime goes 
> down, even more overrepresented than Jews.  Not that there are not 
> plenty of Jews at Citigroup, but it seems that at Citigroup, the
> great Minority Mortgage Meltdown was a South Asian caper, not a
> Jewish caper.
> 
> Morgan Chase has a Jewish CRO, who is notoriously hostile to hasidic 
> Jews, and notoriously ethnic nepotist towards reform Jews, but does
> not seem to be associated with anything obviously dishonest.  In
> particular, did not get his hands all that dirty during the great
> Minority Mortgage Meltdown, unlike his co-religionist, Jordan R.
> Belfort, also known as "the wolf of wall street"
> 
> Bank of America, yes, run by non Jewish white people last I heard. 
> Also, last I heard, not involved in anything obviously dishonest.
>