Anarchocrapitalism, "libertardianism", et al.

[jamesd at echeque.com]

On 1/4/2018 5:21 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> “Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes.”

Are you white?

If so, you will not get far using that argument against affirmative action.

Google up some pictures of high school valedictorians.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=valedictorian&iax=images&ia=images

Observe that they are mostly brown, or female, or brown and female.  And 
I bet the rare light skinned males are Jews or light skinned hispanics.

If you are white and not Jewish, and you have a have a son at school, he 
is going to be discouraged and punished for showing ability, and for 
being male.

If you complain that that this is racist, if you complain when a pack of 
blacks who are biologically adults, even though the same chronological 
age as your son, beat him up, you will be called a racist, no matter how 
piously you condemn me.

"Racist" is just a hate word for "white".  When you call me a racist, it 
is no different from you calling a black man a nigger, or a Jew a kike. 
It is just an angry hateful word for people of a particular ethnic 
group.  Observe that no one called Trayvon Martin a racist even though 
the he indicated to his girlfriend that the fact that Zimmerman was 
light skinned was a major reason Martin decided to attack Zimmerman.

Because Martin Trayvon was not racist.

When a gang of blacks beat up a white man because he is white, that is 
not racism, that is anti racism.  Everyone instinctively calls it anti 
racism.  Because that is what it is.

No one is going to spontaneously call Martin Trayvon "racist" because he 
was in the habit of physically attacking people for being lighter 
skinned than himself, any more than they are going to call me "gay" for 
being light hearted and happy.