Gatwick drones

Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net
Sat Dec 22 11:46:22 PST 2018


On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 06:09:28AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 09:20:11AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
> >  On Friday, December 21, 2018, 12:23:44 PM PST, Steven Schear <schear.steve at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> >  >One has to wonder if the Gatwik dronners simply found a way to modify the wifi frequency placing it out of the ISM band and the military's radio countermeasures were specifically only for those frequencies.
> > That sounds relatively simple.  One problem might be that on a spectrum analyzer, a set of WiFi-looking signals, a few tens of MHz from where WiFi ought to be, would stick out like a sore thumb.
> > The large majority of airport-visiting people have cell phones, and many of them will be accessing WiFi at any given time.  It seems to me that anybody attempting to control a drone secretly might want to "hide in plain sight", using an existing WiFi system.  
> >             Jim Bell  
> 
> With the whooparse USA received over in the Mediterranean, Syria etc,
> a certain (((faction))) realised their stars and stripes war machine
> is not quite up to par with that being delivered by our Russkie
> nation respecting bros, which put somewhat of a halt to the Team
> America nation destroying plan.

Point being, Gatwick is entirely likely a false flag to clandestinely
motivate the govt cheque book and public support for future tech
around drones.



> (At least, that plan for destroying those nations not bound to the
>  BIS and IMF - Libya, Iraq, NK, Syria and Iran.
>  
>  "Surely it could not be that simple, insidious, evil, abhorrent,
>  power hungry, despotic etc?"
> 
>  "Stop calling me Shirley already!"
>  
>  If this draw down/ pull out from Syria and Afghanistan is real,
>  we have avoided the worst of an otherwise likely WW3. You see,
>  $22 trillion debt, or anything in the ball park, was known before it
>  happened - an absolute mathematical certainty of this cyclical
>  instability - the "financial reset" or new "great depression".
> 
>  And this financial moment in history was intended as the tool, along
>  with the dogs of war, to, amidst the chaos of war, the strife
>  arising from infiniggemmigration and general societal unrest,
>  impose the new one world order upon a hapless 7 billion humans.
> 
>  The way this was done is thankfully intolerable to certain
>  unspeakably merciless dictators as Putin and Qadhafi, which is why
>  those two in particular set about meddling into our glorious Western
>  demoncracies as we innocently and graciously swung our international
>  CoCs upon the unwashed, unkempt, uncouth third worlders, second
>  worlders and "yet to be enlightened first worlders", unleasing our
>  merciful rods of power to straighten out this otherwise broken
>  world.
> 
>  Would have been <ahem> a pillar of glory, a shining city on the
>  hill, a new era of peace, unlimited prosperity for the worthy few,
>  and a free global love order for all. </>
>  
>  Why that election meddling cretin Putin took exception to this
>  audacious yet infinitely compassionate plan, is simply beyond me
>  <flutters eyelids> =)
> 
>  Now now muh grits, stop weaponising humour you hear me? or CNN is
>  going to get a hoky tonky cranky danky spanky wanky winky wonky,
>  cranky shanky very stinky, shonky wonky donkey in its breakfast,
>  and we just can't have that now can we?
> 
>   The Wonky Donkey grandmas who struggle to finish the story:
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRtWNrpeXnE
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbsZohEMn38
> 
>   The very silly Wonky Donky song:
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDeQT9zCvi
> )
> 


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list