Banned in the USA: Bump Stocks... Armor Up

[grarpamp]

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/18/politics/bump-stocks-ban/index.html
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5635249/Bump-Stock-Final-Rule.pdf
https://www.ammoland.com/2018/08/las-vegas-bump-stock-foia-response-claims-atf-was-not-allowed-to-examine-weapons/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxgybgEKHHI trump

Due process: A feelgood fiction of all Governments
foisted upon sheeple.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kryIJIrD5eQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2IOZ-5Nk5k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ-FV_VRlXU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFAosibig88
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZCO-06qRgY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RdAhTxyP64

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTGn76YljUM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEH_ms8d1ws
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwNiXABt1JY


https://www.gunowners.org/
https://www.saf.org/
https://www.jpfo.org/
https://www.nationalgunrights.org/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_gun_ownership
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation

In Old English, beran (past tense baer) means to bear, bring, bring
forth, or produce; to endure or sustain; or to wear.

The Bill of Rights 1689 allowed Protestant citizens of England to
"have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as
allowed by Law" and restricted the ability of the English Crown to
have a standing army or to interfere with Protestants' right to bear
arms "when Papists were both Armed and Imployed contrary to Law" and
established that Parliament, not the Crown, could regulate the right
to bear arms.

Sir William Blackstone wrote in the 18th century that the right to
have arms was auxiliary to the "natural right of resistance and
self-preservation" subject to suitability and allowance by law. The
term arms as used in the 1600s, the term refers to the process of
equipping for war. It is commonly used as a synonym for weapon.

Inclusion of this right in a written constitution is uncommon. In
1875, 17 percent of constitutions included a right to bear arms. Since
the early twentieth century, "the proportion has been less than 9
percent and falling". In their historical survey and comparative
analysis of constitutions dating back to 1789, Tom Ginsburg and
colleagues "identified only 15 constitutions (in nine countries) that
had ever included an explicit right to bear arms. Almost all of these
constitutions have been in Latin America, and most were from the 19th
century".

Generally, where modern constitutions refer to arms at all, the
purpose is "to allow the government to regulate their use or to compel
military service, not to provide a right to bear them". Constitutions
which historically guaranteed a right to bear arms are those of
Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Liberia, Mexico,
Nicaragua and the United States of America. Nearly all of the Latin
American examples were modelled on that of the United States. At
present, out of the world’s nearly 200 constitutions, three still
include a right to bear arms: Guatemala, Mexico, and the United
States; of these three, only the last does not include explicit
restrictive conditions.