God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models

Steven Schear schear.steve at gmail.com
Wed Aug 29 21:51:27 PDT 2018


Until, as Andrew "Bunnie" Hwang has written, we have fully OS CPUs and SoCs
(including the pre-boot code which is still proprietary for even otherwise
open designs) we can't even begin to trust them.

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018, 12:22 AM grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8/24/18, Steven Schear <schear.steve at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am told, by a very involved developer in this field, that these
> concerns
> > are a bit overhyped, limited to now outdated Via C3 CPUs.
>
> Of course this anon developer will say that,
> they're either fiction, not in the loop, or an agent.
>
> And unless it's open, neither of you can prove that.
>
> >> #OpenFabs , #OpenHW , #OpenSW , #OpenDev , #OpenBiz
> >> You have zero trust until those happen. ZERO.
>
> >> Publishing the backdoors in Intel's products, and
> >> all the others... makes a fine AP crowdfund target.
> >> Because the Wikileaks model so far either didn't get
> >> or hasn't published the scoop.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1386 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20180829/62c1b6bf/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list