Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

[Steve Kinney]

On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>>> A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed.
>>>> Less time hobbled on "psychedelics".
>>>> More time on "revolutin".
>>>> Or at least gettin hippie dirty, jiggystyle.
>>>> Crypto rave, on.


>> Reportedly good blotter has been available on SR etc.
>>
> 
> On SR, then alphabay - excellent mdma also.
> 
> These services (well, their descendants) are obviously risky as fuck. 
> Better to source privately if possible.

Simple rule:  Cop only from people you know, and don't eat anything they
have not already.

"Stoned on some new potion he found upon the wall of some unholy
bathroom in some ungodly hall" all too accurately describes people who
buy WTF-ever from darknet vendors.  Same shit, different decade.

:o/







-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170905/c134f8e9/attachment-0002.sig>