"CO2 close to lowest levels ever for our planet"

[John Newman]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:02:45AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:53:56PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 10/15/2017 10:50 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > This is one of the best put together summaries of the ???Global
> > > Warming??? (originally global cooling, now PC "climate change") debate
> > > I've ever seen:
> > 
> > Damn! Even I understood that!! Thanks! Ric
> 
> Here's an even easier one - see the picture on page 8 (another little
> doc put together by Gil May) - 4 pine trees grown in controlled
> conditions with varying CO2 levels.
> 
> Plants really needed the CO2 from the industrial revolution -
> otherwise the levels were quite literally precariously low for life
> on this planet. I'd like to see how long we'll be "right" for going
> forward with the amount of plant food we've pumped into our
> atmosphere. At least we're nearly out of the red zone...

Who the fuck is Gil May?

You are the most gullible idiot I've ever... wait, actually, you're
quite representative of a bunch of gullible fucking morons that seem to
dominate humanity. 

Link:

https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/

See attached graph.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 24_co2-graph-021116-768px.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 254296 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20171017/d504abf5/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20171017/d504abf5/attachment-0001.sig>