What is the value of the State?

Steven Schear schear.steve at gmail.com
Sat May 13 10:20:11 PDT 2017

As I mentioned, cosmology is another field whose theories also can never be
conclusively proven and despite massive consensus will remain just that:
only opinion. Here Hawking et al fume at those opposing one of their
cherished theories and the unmitigated gaul to play the Scientific Method


Warrant Canary creator

On May 13, 2017 7:46 AM, "Steven Schear" <schear.steve at gmail.com> wrote:

> Michael Crichton's famous lecture drops the mike on consensus vs. science
> and should be required reading for anyone with an open mind on this topic.
> http://www.burtonsys.com/climate/Aliens_Cause_Global_Warming
> _by_Michael_Crichton.html
> Warrant Canary creator
> On May 13, 2017 4:51 AM, "Zenaan Harkness" <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:27:43PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
>> > If you have read the climategate files, you will know that the new
>> > scientific method, the method of official science, is to determine
>> > the truth by consensus, then look for evidence to support that
>> > official truth, while ignoring or suppressing any contrary
>> > evidence, and if evidence cannot be found to support official
>> > truth, to just make the evidence up.
>> This last bit "make the evidence up" is done with "scientific" models
>> - often retrospective data curve fitting - and this is the problem
>> they (govt paid "Scientist"s) have at the moment, their nice hockey
>> stick curves (from the 1980s?) were modelled perfectly for the data,
>> to fit the desired "scientific" outcome, and now the new data doesn't
>> fit the desired hockey stick outcome, so ridiculous "scientific"
>> explanations are trotted out, from "a global pause in global warming"
>> to "important data points not previously included in the model" and
>> other hogwash pseudo-"science" designed to regenerate the hockey
>> stick.
>> It's political bullshit, not science. They know it. We know. Anyone
>> self respecting adherent to the actual scientific method knows it.
>> But a lot of propaganda to the contrary of the scientific methods is
>> identifying religious nuts to the discerning, which from one view is
>> a public service - just not worth anywhere near the "public"
>> theft-money spent on such "science" propaganda.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3700 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170513/5f890132/attachment.txt>

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list