What is the value of the State?

James A. Donald jamesd at echeque.com
Sat May 13 03:22:51 PDT 2017

On 2017-05-12 09:13, \0xDynamite wrote:
> The word is "site" and it's a bullshit, non-scientific site.

Fact is, official science was caught lying. 

You define all sites that are not official science as "unscientific".

But it is official science that is unscientific.  The very concept of 
"scientific consensus" is a fundamental rejection of the scientific 
method as it was defined by the Royal society from 1660 to 1944.

Consensus is for synods, not scientists.  Global warming is religion, 
not science, and uses the methods of religion.

Official science is inherently unreliable, because if some science is 
official, this is a rejection of the scientific method.

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list