What is the value of the State?

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Thu May 11 17:00:16 PDT 2017


On Thu, 11 May 2017 18:48:02 -0500
"\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward at gmail.com> wrote:

> >> > Those pushing the anthropomorphic climate change agenda never,
> >> > AFAIK, ever admit that this view is ONLY consensus (based on data
> >> > and models) but not independently verifiable via the Scientific
> >> > Method, the gold standard for science.
> >>
> >> You're talking in circles.  What do you suppose the scientific
> >> method is, genius?
> >
> > 	As it happens, I, unlike you, know that the
> > 	scientific method is based on experimentation and trial and
> > 	error applied to SMALL CLOSED SYSTEMS in a REPEATABLE
> > FASHION. Exactly what you CANNOT do with the atmosphere.
> >
> > 	But really, talking to a lawyer, theocrat, statist, quack
> > 	doctor and now enviro, while the titanic is sinking is
> > 	kinda...pointless.
> 
> Especially when you're emotionally invested.  Obviously you're
> emotional about it.


	Emotional about what? You mean I don't want to be ruled by
	idiots (like you) - or by anybody actually? Yep, I am
	'emotional' about that.


>  So just deal with that, rather than pretend.

	Pretend what? 


> 
> But onto your point and logical claim.  No, the scientific method is
> NOT about "small, closed systems" in a "repeatable fashion".  REPEAT:
> NOT about that.


	Sure sure. I forgot you got your education from the Bible.
	Carry on. 

> 
> So anything else you wish to surprise us with, poo-holer?
> 
> \0x




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list