Long, but very good: About Anti-Fascists and Anarchism

Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net
Fri Mar 3 22:51:07 PST 2017


On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 06:17:41PM +0000, jim bell wrote:
> https://attackthesystem.com/2017/02/22/against-the-anti-fascist-creeps/
> (Another partial quote follows:)
> "This may be as a good a definition of fascism as any. However,
> Reid-Ross is not consistent in his adherence to this definition
> throughout the book. He clearly understands that simply defining
> “fascism” according to the popular meaning of the term as synonymous
> with “right-wing authoritarian states” is inaccurate, and highly
> problematic from an analytical perspective.

> However, he subsequently
> proceeds to at least implicitly characterize as “fascist” any kind of
> ideological framework or political tendency that involves any sort of
> real or perceived ethnic, racial, or national differentiation.

Now that makes sense - "fascism is anything opposing an
ethnically (etc) homogeneous future" !

So Antifa is violently opposed to anything standing in the way of a
unified, ethnically homogeneous, global unipolar new world order.

Got it.

Now if I can only figure out why Razer is so pro-NWO !?


  Ethnic homegeneity in the name of ethnic diversity.


And this global ethnically homogeneous outcome must be violently fought
for, to make sure no one opposed this outcome, says Antifa.



> Among
> these are the highly diverse right-wing populist movements of Europe,
> right-wing socialists, various anarchist tendencies, and American
> political currents as varied as neo-Confederates, the Ku Klux Klan,
> Libertarians, the militia movement and the Tea Party.[end of partial
> quote]
> 
> I wondered what libertarians (or capital-L Libertarians) did to
> deserve being linked with, "neo-Confederates", the "Ku Klux Klan",
> etc.

Some of them are probably inclined towards global ethnic diversity (in
the geographic/ "nationalist" sense) rather than global ethnic
homogeneity.


> Then, I realized that those anti-fascists that the author (Keith
> Preston) is alluding to are simply reacting to anyone they don't like
> as being the enemy.

Possibly. But I think there's more to it - violent opposition to (real)
ethnic diversity on the planet.

That's an amazing realisation - that some people are literally violently
opposed to ethnic diversity in this world.

And of course The Ministry insists that they commit their violent acts
under the banner of "freedom of speech" and "protecting diversity"!

What a spin out.


> If nothing else, libertarians would eliminate, or
> at least drastically reduce, the size and control of governments.  

Which would remove the power of the nation state to impose war and
to maximise global ethnic homogeneity. Except when governments have
those in power who might not support that intention...


> Anyone who is in love with large, controlling government would have to
> think of libertarians as being "the enemy".

Indeed.


> This is certainly not the
> first time, in the last few months, I have seen "libertarians" being
> lumped with many other people and organizations, the latter often
> being distasteful.  But what are we to think?

The Ministry is in full swing.



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list