CIA/FBI Throwing Hissie Fit Over WL, Vows Havoc Against All But Self

[Razer]

On 03/09/2017 02:11 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/08/politics/wikileaks-cia-investigation/
> The investigation is looking into how the documents came into
> WikiLeaks' possession and whether they might have been leaked by an
> employee or contractor. 


WL says it WAS leaked by 'an employee or 'hacker contractor'.'

Or maybe that's just a diversion and J Assange himself slipped out of
the Ecuadorian embassy in the middle of the night, snuck into GCHQ, and
purloined the code himself. THAT must be why what WL said wasn't taken
at face. Get Assange!



> The CIA is also trying to determine if there
> are other unpublished documents WikiLeaks may have. 

WL said Vault7 was "1%".

Rr
> The documents
> published so far are largely genuine, officials said, though they are
> not yet certain if all of them are and whether some of the documents
> may have been altered. One of the biggest concerns for the federal
> government is if WikiLeaks publishes critical computer code on how
> operations are conducted, other hackers could take that code and cause
> havoc overseas.
>
>
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/03/hey-cia-you-held-security-flaw-information-now-its-out-thats-not-how-it-should
> Cindy Cohn, writing for EFF: The dark side of this story is that the
> documents confirm that the CIA holds on to security vulnerabilities in
> software and devices -- including Android phones, iPhones, and Samsung
> televisions -- that millions of people around the world rely on. The
> agency appears to have failed to accurately assess the risk of not
> disclosing vulnerabilities to responsible vendors and failed to follow
> even the limited Vulnerabilities Equities Process. As these leaks
> show, we're all made less safe by the CIA's decision to keep -- rather
> than ensure the patching of -- vulnerabilities. Even spy agencies like
> the CIA have a responsibility to protect the security and privacy of
> Americans.