Russia's "eye-watering" military toys

[juan]

On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 11:12:40 +1000
Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:16:15PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 06:21:07 +0000
> > Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > http://journal-neo.org/2015/11/16/do-we-really-want-a-new-world-war-with-russia/
> > 
> > 
> > 	I couldn't find any 'serious' source for the claim that the
> > 	russians jammed that aegis thing. On the other hand I
> > wouldn't be too surprised if those anti-missile missiles didn't
> > work as advertised. 
> > 
> > 
> > 	On a related note, I see that the japanese are 'partners' or
> > 	forcibibly buy that kind of stuff. I assume that any weapon
> > 	that americunts sell is fully backdoored so I kinda wonder
> > what kind of retard can buy stuff from them...Well, the japanese and
> > 	many other seem to be just that kind of retard. 
> 
> You said it above, Japanese 'partners' "forcibly" buy that kind of
> stuff.
> 
> The twin terrorist attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the
> occupation of Japan by America to this day, (and presumably certain
> "behind closed doors" written agreements the Japanese may still be
> bound by), leads of course to that which appears undignified/
> retarded.
> 
> On the other hand, when Russia is your ally, and a substantial part
> of your budget goes to Russian military hardware, you would surely
> -want- to have your missile defence and offense systems hooked in
> with your ally's systems, as a force multiplier - "mesh networked
> radars" comes to mind.
> 
> <I know, I know, stating the obvious dept.>



	Are you? One obvious thing here is that what the russians
	produce is also backdoored. Another obvious thing is that you
	can trust the russians as much as you can trust americunts.