Riseup Warrant Canary Falls?

[Razer]

On 01/19/2017 11:47 PM, No wrote:
>
> Wrong thread >
> https://theintercept.com/2016/11/29/something-happened-to-activist-email-provider-riseup-but-it-hasnt-been-compromised/
>
>

Wasn't the intercept. It was a twitter account of some org affiliated
with riseup but thanks for the link.

Rr


> On 2017-01-20 05:44, Razer wrote:
>>
>> On 01/19/2017 08:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>
>>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13007234
>>>
>>> Not as if anything should be thought untouchable.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I saw something on a twitter feed related to them that said they
>> would be updating it and not to worry and this info is old.
>>
>> Have you checked?
>>
>> Check test 1 2...
>>
>> gpg --verify canary-statement-signed.txt
>>
>> gpg: Signature made Mon 15 Aug 2016 10:01:19 PM PDT using RSA key ID
>> 139A768E
>> gpg: Good signature from "Riseup Networks <collective at riseup.net>"
>> gpg:                 aka "Riseup Treasurer <treasurer at riseup.net>"
>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to
>> the owner.
>> Primary key fingerprint: 4E07 9126 8F7C 67EA BE88  F1B0 3043 E2B7
>> 139A 768E
>>
>> The canary hasn't been updated but the gpg output still shows a good
>> sig (assuming)
>>
>> They could still kill the canary be revoking the key, and they
>> haven't done that.
>>
>> See: https://riseup.net/en/canary
>>
>> Rr
>>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3590 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170120/422cad5f/attachment.txt>