Public Dissentiment

[John Newman]

> On Jan 26, 2017, at 8:34 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:57:19 -0800
> Razer <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
>> ... but the 'truthers' got derailed years ago.
>> That's the problem with conspiracy theory (X) as an analysis of
>> global events. 
> 
>    American fascist rayzer dutifully doing his job - constantly
>    taking pot shots at anybody who doesn't toe the US military
>    party line.
> 
>    The anti-conspiracy nutcases are exactly the same kind of
>    people who used to burn witches....or 'cure' gays with
>    electroshocks and lobotomies - all based on True Science of
>    course. 
> 
>    


Someone who doesn't buy into a particular conspiracy does not (necessarily) share any traits with the religious whack jobs that burned witches at the stake. They were driven by ignorance and religious fervor.

It seems you would like to have it both ways - denying the validity of science when it suits you, and at the same time using your own brand of scientific speculation to support a particular conspiracy, again when it suits you. Either science is real, or it isn't. Hint: science and the scientific method are fucking real. 

Huge mistakes in medical sciences have most definitely been made, but they tend to be self correcting over time. That's how science works. 


>