WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?
juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 8 18:17:28 PST 2017
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:39:00 -0800
Razer <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:
> I have proved
> that (at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking
> the buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is
> mud with wood
By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that. Now I did
and it turns our that you are embarrasing yourself in your usual
cosmic way, like when you showed you know fuck about
pharmacology. So, let's see :
"the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking the
buildings"
No, a plane or missile striking a building has nothing to do
with a tuning fork. If anything, the object that would
have to resonate like a fork would be the struck building. So
your ramblings are just nonsense from the very start. When you
hit a tuning fork, what resonates is the fork, not your finger,
retard.
Plus, the analogy between a building with a mass of 500,000
tons and a tuning forks goes only so far. How much energy from
the alleged plane was transmited to the building and caused the
structure to oscillate (and at what frequency?) ? And how much
energy at a specific frequency then magically travelled
demolished wtc7?
Then you vomit something about "resonance in the ground" -
Too bad the ground is if anything a sink for mechanical
energy - it doesn't have any specific resonant frequency.
To sum up : the idea that mechanical energy from a plane could
be transferred to a SMALL AREA, a couple of blocks away, by
means of waves in the ground, and affect the 'mud' where a
building rests is so fucking crazy that only a troll like you
would advance it. Not to mention again that you got the
elements of your 'theory' mixed up from the begining.
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list