WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:14PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800
> Razer <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote:
> > >
> > > 	If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a
> > > 	building, then the building would magically sink in a
> > > 	pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos
> > > 	showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.
> > >
> > > 	
> > 
> > Ok class. Here we have a tuning fork (A440) and a glass of water. 
> 
> 	I know what resonance is, you motherfucking scumbag. 
> 
> 	Now prove that 
> 
> 	"the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
>  mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." 
> 
> 
> 	Since that is what 'really' happened, it must be documented
> 	everywhere. Even in places like wikimierda. So go ahead, post
> 	the link  : 
> 
> 	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC7_SUNK_IN_BROWN_SHIT_POOL_RAYZERZZ_SAYZ_ZO
> 
> 	Or are you claiming that you are a truther whose TRUE THEORY is
> 	BEING SUPPRESSED by a BURGEOIS CONSPIRACY?

Oh oh oh! I know, I know - pick me! Pick me!  That razonance didn't
liquify the mud, IT LIQUIFIED THE ROCK LAYER under the towers, which
sunk through the rock and the rock de-liquified, leaving no trace
(conspiracy theories and documentaries of 3 days of rapid cleanup of
ground zero to the contrary) of the SUNK TOWERS!

Here's the photographic proof of the post-liquified rock layers at
ground zero:
https://www.metabunk.org/claim-picture-shows-rock-formation-under-wtc-caused-by-nuclear-device.t4595/

(Come on! At least this variant of borderline-Razer-therapy includes
 photographic PROOF of the post-liquiefied rock layer...)

Well color me pre-glacial sandstone.