WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 02:56 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800
> Razer <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class 
> 	that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit
> 	their deranged 'theories', then it's all a 'burgeois'
> 	'conspiracy'

Bourgeoisie denial and rationalization.

There's a difference. Idiot.


>
> 	And of course they love official conspiracy theories.
> 	Whatever the gov't says, it must be right. Especially
> 	regarding mud. 
>
>
>

Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that the
subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were undermined by
the shock wave of a 255,000 lb aircraft (max takeoff weight) hitting a
tall building 2/3s (or so) of the way up causing a 'tuning fork' effect
in the ground below, or 'shear stress' for that matter, is reality and
can be verified by the simplest of experiments.

Saying there was a planned controlled demolition because it 'looked
like', is speculative and without substance of fact.

Moron.

Rr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1790 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170108/ab567ad2/attachment.txt>